Search for: "A v. X, Y, and Z"
Results 101 - 120
of 299
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2016, 7:45 am
Veera v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:17 am
Mongeon Bay Properties LLC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 11:57 am
Esa fue la conclusión a la que llegó el director de la Comisión de Derechos Civiles (CDC), Ever Padilla Ruíz, tras recibir el informe de los 50 observadores del organismo gubernamental que se desplazaron ayer por las 39 cárceles del País con el objetivo de velar por la pulcritud del proceso al que tienen derecho los confinados y que confirma que un sinnúmero de ellos expresó sentirse en total confusión y… [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 4:31 am
Enmendar la legislación electoral para prohibir los donativos en efectivo. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:27 pm
If the greater offense has X, Y, and Z for elements, then the lesser offense only needs X and Y, or Y and Z, etc. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:08 pm
Maryland)The prosecution responded to Friddle’s overbreadth argument by asserting thatthe warrant was not overbroad, because it related solely to `electronic evidence that the defendant already made Officer McClendon aware of that existed’—which, in turn, `leads an officer to know that there might be additional evidence related to this crime on X, Y, and Z piece of evidence or on other electronic means. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
49% thought native ads were unpaid v. 12% for non-native; remainder unsure.What if we tweak the label? [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
First Letter Last Name Division / Judge Floor Courtroom G, 0, S, U Division A — Greco 2nd 20 B, F, P Division B — Myers 1st Floor 12 D, M, N, X, Y Division C — Farr 2nd 24 C, K, R Division D — Lefler 2nd 23 H, L, W Division E — Taylor 2nd 22 A, E, J,… [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 12:46 pm
How language from X opinion was thought by the Court of Appeal in Y opinion to mean Z even though later Court of Appeal opinion A thought that B might not follow from C. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
DoJ didn’t pursue those claims b/c it wanted to test the waters on whether rep could say “we are studying the drug for X, Y, Z (unapproved) and our studies suggest that it works. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 1:20 pm
Or maybe, in (B), Doug's Widgets sells the widgets to X, Y, and Z on credit, but then Doug's goes bankrupt.If there's legally an agreement, then presumably in (A), I can sue eBay for screwing up the sale, and in (B), Acme Manufacturing can sue X, Y, and Z for the purchase price of the widgets, right? [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
X is for Xerox. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 8:10 pm
X is for Xerox. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:41 am
In my field, I don't have to treat anything as authoritative just because X, Y, or Z said it. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 9:01 am
C is for CBC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:58 am
C is for CBC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:07 am
As to the PMA device, plaintiff’s only allegations were that defendant failed to comply with the CGMPs – general, open-ended, non-device specific regulations that state that the defendant should adopt some sort of process for doing X, Y, or Z. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:29 pm
W the Wash in the morning so cold, X for the Xmas well spent, we are told; Y is an Englishman kept like a dog? [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
Section 2 of the Representation Agreement Regulationdefines routing management of the adult’s financial affairs as follows:2 (1) For the purposes of section 7 (1) (b) of the Act, the following activities constitute "routine management of the adult's financial affairs":(a) paying the adult's bills;(b) receiving the adult's pension, income and other money;(c) depositing the adult's pension, income and other money in the adult's accounts;(d) opening… [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]
