Search for: "A v. X, Y, and Z" Results 101 - 120 of 298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2016, 11:57 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Esa fue la conclusión a la que llegó el director de la Comisión de Derechos Civiles (CDC), Ever Padilla Ruíz, tras recibir el informe de los 50 observadores del organismo gubernamental que se desplazaron ayer por las 39 cárceles del País con el objetivo de velar por la pulcritud del proceso al que tienen derecho los confinados y que confirma que un sinnúmero de ellos expresó sentirse en total confusión y… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:27 pm by Andrew Delaney
If the greater offense has X, Y, and Z for elements, then the lesser offense only needs X and Y, or Y and Z, etc. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:08 pm
Maryland)The prosecution responded to Friddle’s overbreadth argument by asserting thatthe warrant was not overbroad, because it related solely to `electronic evidence that the defendant already made Officer McClendon aware of that existed’—which, in turn, `leads an officer to know that there might be additional evidence related to this crime on X, Y, and Z piece of evidence or on other electronic means. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  49% thought native ads were unpaid v. 12% for non-native; remainder unsure.What if we tweak the label? [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
First Letter Last Name Division / Judge Floor Courtroom G, 0, S, U    Division A — Greco   2nd   20   B, F, P    Division B — Myers   1st Floor   12   D, M, N, X, Y    Division C — Farr   2nd   24   C, K, R    Division D — Lefler   2nd   23   H, L, W    Division E — Taylor   2nd   22   A, E, J,… [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 12:46 pm
 How language from X opinion was thought by the Court of Appeal in Y opinion to mean Z even though later Court of Appeal opinion A thought that B might not follow from C. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  DoJ didn’t pursue those claims b/c it wanted to test the waters on whether rep could say “we are studying the drug for X, Y, Z (unapproved) and our studies suggest that it works. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 1:20 pm
 Or maybe, in (B), Doug's Widgets sells the widgets to X, Y, and Z on credit, but then Doug's goes bankrupt.If there's legally an agreement, then presumably in (A), I can sue eBay for screwing up the sale, and in (B), Acme Manufacturing can sue X, Y, and Z for the purchase price of the widgets, right? [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:41 am by Daniel Shaviro
 In my field, I don't have to treat anything as authoritative just because X, Y, or Z said it. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:07 am
            As to the PMA device, plaintiff’s only allegations were that defendant failed to comply with the CGMPs – general, open-ended, non-device specific regulations that state that the defendant should adopt some sort of process for doing X, Y, or Z. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:29 pm by Marissa Grunes
W the Wash in the morning so cold, X for the Xmas well spent, we are told; Y is an Englishman kept like a dog? [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
Section 2 of the Representation Agreement Regulationdefines routing management of the adult’s financial affairs as follows:2  (1) For the purposes of section 7 (1) (b) of the Act, the following activities constitute "routine management of the adult's financial affairs":(a) paying the adult's bills;(b) receiving the adult's pension, income and other money;(c) depositing the adult's pension, income and other money in the adult's accounts;(d) opening… [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm by David Cheifetz
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]