Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 101 - 120
of 11,586
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 3:30 am
This court hears appeals both from all district court patent litigation and from decisions by examiners at the USPTO. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
Alas, I did not get my chance to conduct this examination before trial. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 4:41 pm
“They examined him and sent him to Bellevue. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:26 pm
A close reading of its five parts then follows. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:28 pm
Subheadline: "The legal issue behind Weinstein’s successful appeal is also at the heart of the former President’s hush-money case. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
On cross-examination, the SEC confronted Panuwat with his deposition testimony, in which he testified that he could not recall why he had purchased the Incyte options Following an eight-day trial and three hours of deliberations, the jury found Panuwat liable Panuwat is likely to appeal the verdict. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:39 am
Applicant appealed. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:11 pm
You can expect a more in depth interview if the Psychologist believes there are areas of concern which require closer examination. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:30 am
The IPKat is pleased to host a guest contribution from Katfriend Roberto Manno (WebLegal.it), who examines a recent Italian judgment on the scope of plant variety rights under EU law. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:18 am
Substantial similarity requires that the two have enough similarities that an ordinary observer would believe that one is imitating the appeal of the other. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 7:00 am
” Thus, “a narrow or rigid reading of prior art that does not recognize reasonable inferences that a PHOSITA would have drawn is inappropriate. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:53 am
Accordingly, the Board of Appeal compared the seven features (or sub-groups of features) of the prior design with the overall six features (or sub-groups of features) of the contested RCD (Case R 726/2021-3 para 51 et seq.).Pumas are bigger KatsIn doing so, the Board of Appeal correctly held that the point of reference for the assessment of the individual character is the contested RCD under examination given it is its validity which is at issue. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
In KMN v SZM, 2024 BCCA 70 (CanLII), the British Columbia Court of Appeal (BCCA) recognized the existence of this myth and the need for courts to avoid making assumptions that perpetuate it, holding that it is erroneous to do so unless there is an evidentiary basis for a finding of false allegations. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
Read the press release here. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:36 pm
This decision is a treatise for lawyers on the evidentiary issues that arise in a family law trial and ought to be required reading for law students in Canada. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
Standing must exist at all stages of litigation including throughout all authorized appeals and habeas corpus petitions. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Kwong looks forward to defeating these sensationalized claims through the appeals process, not in the press. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:35 am
Lottery offences are covered under s. 206, 207, 207.1 and 209 of the Criminal Code, found in Part VII. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
Appeals Board Significant Panel Decision Ja’Chim Scheuing (Sandra) v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
(See, for example, Lisa Laplante’s discussion of some limits of technocratic transitional justice mechanisms like truth commissions and trials in Peru; Rachel López’s examination of the need to look beyond prosecutions to address questions of collective memory in Guatemala; Darin Johnson’s analysis of the various mechanisms employed to build support for participatory democracy in Sudan; and Zachary Kaufman’s assessment of political and social responses to the… [read post]
