Search for: "A. A.C. R." Results 101 - 120 of 280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
The judgment In determining the lawfulness of the delayed notification of the deportation order, the Court quoted Lord Steyn’s majority judgment in R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 A.C. 604: Notice of a decision is required before it can have the character of a determination with legal effect because the individual concerned must be in a position to challenge the decision in the courts if he or she wishes to do so. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:20 am
No evidence is admissible on such a motion: r. 19(27) of the Supreme Court Rules (now r. 9-5(2) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules). [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 11:31 am
Awua (R (ex p Awua) v Brent LBC [1996] 1 A.C. 55) did not help Birmingham because the accommodation in that case was acceptable albeit short life housing. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:05 pm by Douglas
A ideia surgiu ainda com os gregos, por volta de 600 a.C. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:05 pm by Douglas
A ideia surgiu ainda com os gregos, por volta de 600 a.C. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
Sheila McCrea was recently sentenced to 6 years in prison after she crashed her car on the Atlantic City Expressway on July 19, 2009. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 andPinnock adopted. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 and Pinnock adopted. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 and Pinnock adopted. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm by NL
It would therefore be inappropriate to grant the mandatory order if the court was of the view that permission would not be given.Permission in this case would depend on consideration of R (on the application of G) v Barnet LBC [2003] UKHL 57, [2004] 2 A.C. 208. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm by NL
It would therefore be inappropriate to grant the mandatory order if the court was of the view that permission would not be given.Permission in this case would depend on consideration of R (on the application of G) v Barnet LBC [2003] UKHL 57, [2004] 2 A.C. 208. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 6:41 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
There will be a tax on our soon to be strong border of 35% for these companies …… wanting to sell their product, cars, A.C. units etc., back across the border. [read post]