Search for: "A. R.C. M."
Results 101 - 120
of 238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2017, 10:03 am
”) At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Joseph M. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
And R.C. 2117.06(A)(1) already does that. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
McDonald Village Police Dept., 70 Ohio St.3d 351, 639 N.E.2d 31 (1994) ( R.C. 2744.03(A)(6)(b) applies to the actions of a law-enforcement officer.) [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
”) R.C. 2929.20 Sentence reduction through judicial release. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:04 am
Luckily I’m retired, and don’t have torts exams to grade this December. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Johnson & Johnson, which rejected a facial challenge to R.C. 2315.18. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 6:38 am
”) Merit Decision I’m cutting straight to the chase here. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 8:25 am
The balancing test is now codified at R.C. 2505.02(A)(2).) [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:35 am
I’m not making this up. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:35 am
I’m not making this up. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:31 am
Accordingly, the appellate court in Sines held that the common pleas court impermissibly used Mentor's zoning ordinance as a basis for reversal (of the granting of liquor permits), contrary to R.C. 4303.292(A)(2)(a).So what is the moral of this story? [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Just days ago, that same adult threw a cup of urine in R.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:28 am
The statutory phrase, “transacts business” in R.C. 4117.13(D) is not ambiguous. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
I’m emphasizing the new judicial federalism aspect of the decision, which has long been an interest of mine. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:40 am
Lest you think I’m relying on scare tactics, the case actually involved an employee fired after filing a false workers’ comp claim against his employer. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
R.C. 2953.73(E)(1) does not. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
”) R.C. 149.43(C)(2)(c) (Court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees are remedial, not punitive. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:41 am
Laws 12-7-20 (arrestee “shall be afforded, as soon after being detained as practicable, not to exceed one hour from the time of detention, the opportunity to make use of a telephone for the purpose of securing an attorney or arranging for bail”; call may be confidential) As always, I’m interested in readers’ thoughts and experiences. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:41 am
Laws 12-7-20 (arrestee “shall be afforded, as soon after being detained as practicable, not to exceed one hour from the time of detention, the opportunity to make use of a telephone for the purpose of securing an attorney or arranging for bail”; call may be confidential) As always, I’m interested in readers’ thoughts and experiences. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:22 am
(I’m betting Pryor will name the Army anyway in his notice of appeal this time.) [read post]
