Search for: "ACLU" Results 101 - 120 of 16,638
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2024, 9:52 am by David Cole
ACLU Files Amicus Brief Urging Supreme Court to Reject Attempt to Weaken Civil Rights Law Source: American Civil Liberties Union The dissenting opinions saw the case entirely differently. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 8:10 am by Rick Garnett
First, the Solicitor General and a group of parents, represented by the ACLU, have asked the Court to consider challenges to laws banning medical transition procedures for minors. [read post]
The ACLU of Arkansas released a statement in opposition, stating that the proposed emergency rule “seeks to erase the existence of non-binary and intersex Arkansans by denying them identity documents that reflect their true selves, forcing them into categories that do not represent their identities. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 5:01 pm by Jason Kelley
EFF and the ACLU had filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of a challenge to the law brought by TikTok and a group of the app’s users who live in Montana. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:27 pm by Joe Mullin
As an ACLU attorney who litigated against the BRCA gene patents has pointed out, this scenario is not fantastical if a bill like PERA were to advance. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:00 pm by Hudson Hongo
The brief by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the ACLU of Nevada, the EFF, Stanford Internet Observatory Research Scholar Riana Pfefferkorn, and six other organizations asks the court to reject a request by Nevada’s attorney general to stop Meta from offering end-to-end encryption by default to Facebook Messenger users under 18 in the state. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 1:49 pm by Guest Author
 Both the ACLU, which is representing the NRA, and numerous liberal law professors have filed amici that answer “no. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:30 am by Unknown
(Just Security Blog, Feb. 2024) [text]Reports & journal articles:"The 14th Circuit," Washington University Law Review, vol. 102, no. 3 (Forthcoming, 2025) [preprint]From Hope to Heartbreak: The Disturbing Reality of Border Patrol's Confiscation of Migrants' Belongings (ACLU et al., Feb. 2024) [text]"Innocence and danger at the border: migrants, 'Bad' mothers, and the nation’s protectors," Comparative Migration Studies, 12:13 (Feb. 2024)… [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:30 am by Ars Contributors
Jennifer Stisa Granick is the surveillance and cybersecurity counsel with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. [read post]
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has called out against the proposal of SB-1 in a press release, calling the bill a voter-suppression tactic. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:32 am by jonathanturley
  Berkeley has been the focus of much concern over the use of a heckler’s veto on our campuses as violent protesters have succeeded in silencing speakers, including a speaker from the ACLU discussing free speech. [read post]
” In support of the application, the ACLU of Texas, in a joint statement, said, “We have long warned that this law will separate families, lead to racial profiling across the state, and harm people across the state as Governor Abbott continues his relentless campaign against people who are immigrants. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
The ACLU's participating in the case sends that message loud and clear. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:34 pm by Jack Bogdanski
Let's hope the voters around here wake up and show these birds the door soon.And as we enter marks next to their names, let's not forget that the Oregon ACLU was down there eggging them on. [read post]
In response to the passage of the bill, Policy Director of the ACLU of Oregon Jessica Maravilla stated: Together, ACLU of Oregon’s more than 27,000 members imagined an Oregon filled with healing and thriving communities, not more jails and prisons. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
The ACLU of Indiana called the decision a “disappointing and a heartbreaking development. [read post]
The ACLU of Texas, who filed the lawsuit challenging SB4 on behalf of a group of plaintiffs, celebrated the decision, saying it affirms federal supremacy in immigration law and protects immigrant communities. [read post]