Search for: "ADAMS v. SMALL."
Results 101 - 120
of 718
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
The application was made in bad faith and was an “instrument of fraud”, relying on BT v One in a Million [1999] 1 WLR 903, which established that domain names registered by squatters were instruments of fraud and their registration could amount to passing off even without any active use of them.District Judge Hart (on the IPEC Small Claims track) gave a first instance judgment on 25 March 2020 agreeing with the claimant, but granted permission to appeal.An appeal was… [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 3:00 pm
" That was the right policy when the United States was small and weak. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Accordingly, the PTO’s absolute ban on the registration of marks such as TRUMP TOO SMALL is far more extensive than necessary to protect the right of publicity, which would not prevent the use of TRUMP TOO SMALL under any state’s right of p [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 8:25 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 11:32 am
” [cite to USTA v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:02 am
As reported in the New York Times, that appears to have happened with Washington ex rel Seattle Title Trust Company v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
King v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
And it is worth remembering that the John Lewis Act had seemed to be the bill most likely to receive at least some Republican support, because it mostly tries to restore the status quo ante that the Supreme Court’s conservative majority destroyed in Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 10:22 am
Amicus [Adam P. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:58 am
“It all comes down to the cost of incremental residuals, and increasing chargebacks are going to be a knock against that,” said industry attorney Adam Atlas. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
He was adamant, no conversations with attorneys I had not hired. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
When elections are closely divided, even small interference with various groups' ability to affect public opinion can make a big difference in outcomes.[8] FedEx and Verizon shouldn't have the power to thus affect elections by refusing to carry certain views. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
Many thanks to Adam to talking me around on the subject. [* * *] Title 47 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
Bentley v Bentley: Clothing beats Motors again in the Court of AppealBentley Motors Limited v (1) Bentley 1962 Limited (2) Brandlogic Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 1726 (December 2020) This was the first ever case featured in Retromark and turned up again in Volume 7. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:53 am
[See SDL Hair Ltd v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:11 pm
The case, Terry v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:21 am
Philadelphia, the Supreme Court Should Remember That Foster Care Is for the Children (James Dwyer, National Review) The New, Conservative Supreme Court Is Returning to the Second Amendment (Adam Gopnik, The New Yorker) Democrats wary of appearing to push Justice Breyer out despite their small window to replace him (Ariane de Vogue, Manu Raju & Phil Mattingly) The post The morning read for Friday, May 7 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
3 May 2021, 3:00 pm
Adam Scales is also expressly quoted as someone who opposes any such expurgation policy. [read post]
