Search for: "AHMAD v. STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
A Commentary on Oliari v Italy, (Article 29, August 21, 2015).Muhammad Mushtaq Ahmad, The Crime of Rape and the Hanafi Doctrine of Siyasah, (Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 6:1 (2014), 161-192).Terry A. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
,  Brief of Amici Curiae Legal Scholars in Support of Equality in Support of Respondents, Fulton v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:42 am by Jocelyn Hutton
R v Ahmad & Anor and R v Fields & Ors, heard 10 – 11 February 2014. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:14 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE
  That arrest was the starting point of an eight-year legal fight, via the European Court of Human Rights, by Mr Ahmad unsuccessfully to avoid extradition to the United States on terrorism charges. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am by Dave
The problem for Newham is/was that their allocations policy states that allocations medical assessments are to be done in-house by an officer as part of a particular team. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am by Dave
The problem for Newham is/was that their allocations policy states that allocations medical assessments are to be done in-house by an officer as part of a particular team. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:46 pm by justinsilverman
The state seems to be censoring Ahmad’s speech because of actions separate from the speech itself. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 11:29 pm
There's something curious about the United States' position in Munaf v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
In the event that extradition is denied on that basis, Article 3(2) requires the Requested State to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution if the Requesting State so requests and if the laws of the Requested State so allow. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Assuming that the malpractice claim accrued on January 11, 2013, when the time to answer the underlying complaint expired, or the earlier date of December 28, 2012, when the insurer disclaimed coverage, Billiard was prevented from exercising any legal remedy by virtue of the underlying motion court’s order, which denied the underlying plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment against Billiard, until that order was subsequently reversed by the Second Department in September 2015 (Gershman… [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:38 pm by Howard Friedman
Earlier this month, a 2-judge panel of the Pakistani Supreme Court in Mubarak Ahmad Sani v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Law):Neil Weinstock Netanel, Introduction to: From Maimonides to Microsoft: The Jewish Law of Copyright Since the Birth of Print, (Oxford University Press 2016).Asim Jusic, SAS v. [read post]