Search for: "AMERICAN CAPITAL, LTD." Results 101 - 120 of 466
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2020, 6:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  It was given to those who signed up for a free trial of Agora’s financial newsletter, which cost $99/year if they didn’t cancel.It was promoted with ads including the claims:  “In case you haven’t heard yet, a small group of in-the-know Americans are now collecting ‘Congressional Checks’ of up to $6,235 each. [read post]
Continuing our annual tradition, we have compiled our top developments and headlines for 2019 & 2020 in trade secret, non-compete, and computer fraud law. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 1:29 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Vice President, North American Claims Group at Allied World, provide an insurer perspective, both from an underwriter and claims advisor point of view, on the issue of late notice. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 12:00 pm by Silver Law Group
The other co-managers for the offering were AltaCorp Capital Inc., Beacon Securities Limited, Bryan, Garnier & Co Ltd, Cormark Securities Inc., Eight Capital, GMP Securities L.P., Laurentian Bank Securities Inc., PI Financial Corp., and Roth Capital Partners, LLC. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 2:08 pm
 Perhaps because it has become fashionable to trash all things Americans, with the complicity of some sector off the American intelligentsia, the Forum this year took place immediately before the US Thanksgiving holiday, which requited some to make a difficult choice between public duty and family life. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 2:25 pm by Silver Law Group
The post Silver Law Group Investigates Maxar Technologies Ltd (MAXR) appeared first on Securities Arbitration Lawyers Blog. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:05 am by Liz Dunshee
The companies included Illumina Inc. (37.7%), Simon Property Group Inc. (37.1%), American Water Works Company Inc. (37.0%), Duke Energy Corp. (35.8%), Wyndham Destinations (35.6%), American Tower Corp. (35%), Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (34.5%), Wynn Resorts Ltd. (34.4%) CMS Energy Corp. (34.3%), Equinix Inc. (34.2%), DTE Energy Co. (33.6%), and J.B. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 6:24 pm by Peter Mahler
See Kassab v Kassab, 2015 WL 11090346, * 2 (Sup Ct, Queens County 2015) (LLC member had no right to buyout where claim for dissolution dismissed and LLC’s operating agreement did not contain buyout provision); see also Belardi-Ostroy, Ltd. v American List Counsel, Inc., 2016 NY Slip Op 30727 [U], 10 n.8 (Sup Ct, NY County 2016) (“the remedy of ‘equitable buyout’ is unavailable when [plaintiff] fails to state a claim for dissolution”), citing, inter… [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 3:05 am by Liz Dunshee
The History of Stock Buybacks This WSJ article posits that “Share buybacks are as American as mom, apple pie and hot dogs on the Fourth of July. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by Hollis Kelly
Romania’s ruling Social Democratic Party (Partidul Social Democrat) (“PSD“) survived a Parliamentary no confidence vote on 18 June 2019. [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:28 am by Renae Lloyd
The claim further alleges that Advisory Group Equity Services, Ltd. unsuitably invested the client in the following high risk private placement investments: Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT American Realty Capital Griffin Capital Essential Asset REIT United Realty Trust Vereit Resource Royalty Growth & Income IVFirst Capital Real Estate Trust GWG Holdings The claim seeks damages between $500,000.01 and $1,000,000.00. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am by Kirk Jenkins
  The Supreme Court made short shrift of the argument, holding that the Sherman Act was based on the proposition that both export and import trade were possible and desirable – a proposition that was “wholly inconsistent” with the view that free foreign commerce in goods must be sacrificed to promote the export of American capital for investment in foreign factories to sell abroad. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am by Kirk Jenkins
  The Supreme Court made short shrift of the argument, holding that the Sherman Act was based on the proposition that both export and import trade were possible and desirable – a proposition that was “wholly inconsistent” with the view that free foreign commerce in goods must be sacrificed to promote the export of American capital for investment in foreign factories to sell abroad. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am by Kirk Jenkins
  The Supreme Court made short shrift of the argument, holding that the Sherman Act was based on the proposition that both export and import trade were possible and desirable – a proposition that was “wholly inconsistent” with the view that free foreign commerce in goods must be sacrificed to promote the export of American capital for investment in foreign factories to sell abroad. [read post]