Search for: "AMERICAN SIGNATURE V US" Results 101 - 120 of 602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2020, 9:38 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The disparities regarding the copyright protection afforded to foreign authors on the North American continent were only resolved with the signature of the Berne Convention by the British Empire and thereafter a bilateral copyright treaty between the British Empire and the US. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31 (AFSCME)[6] and National Institute of Family & Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31 (AFSCME)[6] and National Institute of Family & Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:23 am
Some of these reproductions sported a Rodin signature and sometimes even the mark of the foundry used by Rodin, the Rudier foundry, instead of the mark of the Italian foundry who actually manufactured these copies. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
American Signature, Inc., 2015 WL 12999664, No. 11-cv-427 (S.D. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
My article argued that, in my experience as an NGO person debating with US military lawyers about a wide variety of human rights and law of war matters over a couple of decades, the peculiarity of the US military lawyer was a preference to treat such matters not as a matter of moral vision, but of "merely" technical lawyering, apolitical technical legal matters, and negotiation of the the US national security interest. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 3:57 am by Scott Bomboy
" Then Hamilton’s appeal to the jury was one of the signature moments in American legal history. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:49 am by Steve
American Constitional Law Foundation, 525 U.S. 182 (1999). [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm by CoL .net
This may be owing to the fact that there is no signature or that it is forged, etc. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:32 am by Ben
In a lawsuit filed on 22 January 2018 in California District Court SMASH 137 argues that his mural was used in the advertisements without his knowledge or consent (Adrian Falkner v General Motors, Case 2:18-cv-00549-SVW-JPR). [read post]