Search for: "AVANCE v. STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 2:57 am
These various recent developments show that many hopes and challenges exist in a pluralistic world where nuclear-weapon States and non-nuclear-weapon States continue to oppose each other in this highly sensitive area. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 12:55 am
Immoral activity from claim 7 can be covered up with reality restructuring mentioned in claim 12.Apparemment, l'inventeur a intenté une action devant un tribunal du Minnesota contre David Copperfield en 2005 pour usurpation de pouvoirs divins...Au cas où ces pouvoirs seraient véridiques, merci d'avance aux commentateurs de ne pas offenser l'inventeur ! [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:44 am by Florian Mueller
By contrast, in the United States the government firstly has to go to court and seek an injunction from an impartial judge. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm by Igor Nikolic
The Huawei v ZTE case provided a framework for good-faith negotiation, and courts of the EU member states have become accustomed to evaluating the conduct of both parties. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 1:57 pm by Eric Goldman
Avance * Restricting Competitive Keyword Ads Is Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Another Failed Trademark Suit Over Competitive Keyword Advertising–JIVE v. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 9:17 am by Eric Goldman
Avance * Restricting Competitive Keyword Ads Is Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Another Failed Trademark Suit Over Competitive Keyword Advertising–JIVE v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:33 am by Keith Mallinson
” Similarly, in Germany in Nokia v Daimler, the Mannheim court stated that the “royalty provided in [Daimler’s] counter-offer is not reasonable, as the reference value used in the top-down approach in the form of the average purchase price of [TCUs] is unsuitable. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 7:27 am by Eric Goldman
Avance * Restricting Competitive Keyword Ads Is Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Another Failed Trademark Suit Over Competitive Keyword Advertising–JIVE v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 10:04 am
Peter Martinsson noted the Avanci pool as a step in that direction.Gertjan asked about the consequences of late declaration (noting the Apple v Core Wireless decision in the Federal Circuit). [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 1:04 pm
It is organized by the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Facultad de derecho y Consejería Presidencial para los Derechos Humanos and will take place martes (Tuesday) 20 y miércoles (Wednesday) 21 de marzo (March) 2018 at the Pontifical University in Bogotá Columbia (Building Jorge Hoyos Vásquez, SJ AUDITORIUM ALFONSO QUINTANA, SJ Floor 3, Carrera 7 # 40b 36 (Tuesday) and (Building No. 95, Manuel Briceño Jáuregui SJ, SJ AUDITORIUM VASQUEZ JAIME… [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am by Merpel McKitten
  The second question was subject to the CJEU referral in the Nokia v Daimler (see previous posts here), but which has so far remained unanswered in Europe. [read post]