Search for: "Abbe Gluck" Results 101 - 120 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2015, 5:57 am by Edward A. Fallone
On October, 5 I participated in an event at the Marquette University Law School entitled “Supreme Court Roundup” with Cato Institute Scholar Ilya Shapiro. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As Abbe Gluck has explained, Roberts wrote a “game-changing statutory interpretation opinion. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:28 am by Kali Borkoski
Health-care symposium contributors: Nicholas Bagley – University of Michigan Randy Barnett – Georgetown Michael Cannon – Cato David Rivkin – BakerHostetler Einer Elhauge – Harvard Tom Fisher – Indiana Abbe Gluck – Yale Brianne Gorod – Constitutional Accountability Center Timothy Jost – Washington and Lee Adam White – Boyden Gray & Associates Housing symposium contributors: Cory Andrews – Washington… [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:16 am by Randy Barnett
But I knew that the administration’s defenders such as Abbe Gluck and Nick Bagley had a reasonable-sounding if perhaps overly-complex argument, which was based on the text of the statute, rather than on either improper appeals to its overall purpose or to implausible assertions of scrivener’s error. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Burwell — A Reply to Abbe Gluck — a textual analysis of the PPACA and response to a prominent advocate for the government’s position. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:45 am by Ezra Rosser
 As can be seen from the list below, several are of course poverty related articles [But note, you may have to get these through other services like Lexis, Westlaw, or Hein]: INTRODUCTION 1 Symposium Issue Introduction: The Law of Medicare and Medicaid at Fifty Abbe R. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by Amy Howe
”  At Politico Magazine, Abbe Gluck contends that, “[a]t long last, the federalism implications of the Obamacare challenge . . . appear widely understood. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:14 am by Neil Siegel
  Specifically, Justice Kennedy seized upon “a serious constitutional problem” if the Court were to accept the challengers’ reading of the statute—a problem that Abbe Gluck has underscored to great effect. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:15 pm by Guest Blogger
The federalism argument has been made in two important Supreme Court amicus curiae briefs, one submitted on behalf of 22 states and the District of Columbia, and another on behalf of four law professors – Abbe Gluck, Gillian Metzger, Thomas Merrill, and Nicholas Bagley.The federalism argument is based on the doctrine of Pennhurst State Hospital v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:23 pm
Burwell – A Reply to Abbe Gluck – a textual analysis of the PPACA and response to a prominent advocate for the government’s position. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:27 am
 Yale’s Abbe Gluck, writing in Politico last week, invoked Gregory v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am by Guest Blogger
  Rather textualism requires the Court to consider the meaning of particular provisions in light of the entire text of the law.A brieffiled by Thomas Merrill, Gillian Metzger, Abbe Gluck, and Nicholas Bagley discusses the different forms of federalism represented in government programs and demonstrates that a prohibition on premium tax credits for federal exchanges is inconsistent with the kind of cooperative federalism program represented by the ACA marketplaces. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:47 am by Gustavo Arballo
Gluck)Chevron, the most famous rule of administrative law, is also a central doctrine of statutory interpretation. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:53 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Bohrer ·         Kathleen Boozang * ·         Leslie Francis ·         Abbe Gluck ·         Mark Hall ·         Nan Hunter ·         Joan Krause * … [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:08 am by Amy Howe
”  At The Volokh Conspiracy, Jonathan Adler responds to Abbe Gluck’s post on the grant in King for this blog; he contends that, if the Court limits its inquiry to the text of the ACA, “it should conclude that the IRS tax credit rule is unlawful. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 2:30 am by Larisa Vaysman
Although “interpretive pronouncements” are probably not binding on future panels, see Abbe R. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:17 am
Other contributors, thus far, include Nicholas Bagley and Abbe Gluck, two of the more thoughtful folks on other side of this case. [read post]