Search for: "Ackerman v Ackerman"
Results 101 - 120
of 467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Appellate Division, First Department In proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel fee In Kelly G v Circe H, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2019 WL 6869009 (1stDept.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the… [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
It is worth noting that Bruce Ackerman's important rendering of the the New Deal as a "constitutional moment" amending the Constitution outside Article V in effect requires ignoring, or at least diminishing the relevance, of McCulloch. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
If McCulloch v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
On 4 November 2019 Saini J heard an application in the case of ABC v Google LLC. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Ben Stokes v The Sun: gross intrusion or simple reportage? [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 12:16 am
In a new decision last week, State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Laird and Marbury v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
Dagenhart and United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:20 am
Nor is summary judgment precluded by defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaim, since the record shows that plaintiff performed a great deal of work that was unrelated to the isolated malpractice claim found viable by the court (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453 [2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 904 [2014]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein v Ackerman, 280 AD2d 355, 356 [2001]). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:20 am
Nor is summary judgment precluded by defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaim, since the record shows that plaintiff performed a great deal of work that was unrelated to the isolated malpractice claim found viable by the court (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453 [2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 904 [2014]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein v Ackerman, 280 AD2d 355, 356 [2001]). [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
If one thinks at it in this way, Conservatives and the Constitution is in dialogue with important theories of constitutional regimes and constitutional change like Bruce Ackerman’s. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am
Feinman, 99 N.Y.2d 295, 301 [2002], quoting Ackerman v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am
In his dissent in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:25 am
See Ackerman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 11:15 am
Facts: This case (Ackerman et al v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
Ackerman, and Darius W. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
Ackerman Darius W.Dynkowski Ackerman Ackerman & Dynkowski In federal condemnation actions, federal substantive and procedural laws, as opposed to state laws, are controlling.1Federal condemnations are currently controlled by Rule 71.1, formerly FRCP 71A, of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Ackerman, Ackerman & Dynkowski I. [read post]
