Search for: "Adams Express v. New York"
Results 101 - 120
of 403
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2012, 6:24 am
Writing at the Opinionator blog of The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse argues that race will be the central issue of the upcoming Term at the Court. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
  Following on Adam Liptak’s article earlier this week in the New York Times on Justice Scalia’s hesitance to discuss Brown v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 am
In comparison, Daniels may be the only authentic part of the entire case in New York v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:20 am
The LA Times chronicles the relationship between Justice Kennedy and the Chief Justice, reporting that "to pursue a conservative shift, Roberts must win Kennedy's vote," while Adam Liptak of the New York Times analyzes the exchanges between the majority and dissenting opinions. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak looks at the solicitor general’s response to the Supreme Court’s request that the government weigh in on the cert petition in Sokolow v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:19 am
And at The New York Times, Adam Liptak describes Justice Stevens's "full-throated" and disappointed dissent, noting that his recent opinions have been united by the theme that the Court has "lost touch with fundamental notions of fair play. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:02 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Jennifer Daskal explains why the court’s recent decision to review digital-privacy case United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:27 am
" The chief fact at issue on ECUSA's and its rump diocese's motions was whether or not ECUSA is a "hierarchical" church, i.e., a church in which, as the United States Supreme Court expressed it in its 1872 decision in Watson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
The Justices produced six separate opinions, as Adam Liptak at the New York Times reports. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:44 am
” Adam Liptak reported on both cases for The New York Times, as did David Savage for The Los Angeles Times and Jess Bravin for the Wall Street Journal (subscription required). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Student Loan Case Could Redefine Limits of Presidential Power DNyuz – Michael Shear and Adam Liptak (New York Times) | Published: 3/1/2023 One of President Biden’s most ambitious proposals, a $400 billion program to forgive student loan debt for 40 million Americans, could become the latest victim of a legal tug of war with the U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
New York: New York enacts the Retail Worker Safety Act, requiring employers with 10 or more retail employees to establish a workplace violence prevention policy and training program. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
In an op-ed for the New York Times, Lakhdar Boumediene – the lead plaintiff in Boumediene v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:09 am
Briefly: Adam Liptak of The New York Times reports on a new study which concludes that, although the Roberts Court as a whole is only “slightly more conservative” than the Burger or Rehnquist Courts, the Court’s decisions in business cases have been “far friendlier to business than those of any court since at least World War II. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:55 am
Reporting on the argument, Adam Liptak of the New York Times observes that “several justices seemed inclined to find a way to help Mr. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:39 pm
The New York Times reports on the denial of certiorari here. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:39 pm
The New York Times reports on the denial of certiorari here. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Examples of trademark experts with this view include professors Rebecca Tushnet and Jennifer Rothman; attorneys Megan Bannigan, David Bernstein, Timothy Cuffman, and Jon Jekel; and news reporters from the New York Times (Adam Liptak) and Bloomberg (Greg Stohr). [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:18 am
” Briefly: In The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “a group of prominent [Republican] politicians filed briefs on Tuesday urging the Supreme Court to rule that extreme political gerrymandering — the drawing of voting districts to give lopsided advantages to the party in power — violates the Constitution. [read post]
