Search for: "Adams v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 2,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2016, 9:55 am by Andrew Hamm
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:05 pm
Adams, plaintiff brought suit in 2005 against defendant Mary Noel Adams stemming from defendant’s use of the trademark PHASE FORWARD.After the Trademark Dilution Revision Act was enacted in October 2006, defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff’s mark did not meet the amended definition of a “famous mark” as one “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United… [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:02 pm
Finally, the article will highlight the legal problems posed by § 3509(m) and comment on current case law, including the pending case of United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Adams runs Science On Trial, Inc., which "provides forensic consultation services across the United States and the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States and the tax in Moore v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:31 pm by The Federalist Society
In an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court held that (1) Lexmark exhausted its patent rights in toner cartridges sold in the United States through its "Return Program"; and (2) Lexmark cannot sue Impression Products for patent infringement with respect to cartridges Lexmark sold abroad, which Impression Products acquired from purchasers and imported into the United States, because an authorized sale outside the United States,… [read post]