Search for: "Affirmative Insurance Company" Results 101 - 120 of 5,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2016, 4:30 am by Christina Phillips
All too often in fire claims insurance companies are quick to deny a fire claim and assert that the insured was involved in setting the fire. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 4:30 am by Christina Phillips
All too often in fire claims insurance companies are quick to deny a fire claim and assert that the insured was involved in setting the fire. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:31 pm by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
The at-fault party, in particular, expects his or her insurance company to step in and defend the claim for them, shielding them from full personal liability. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:54 am by Cecere Santana, P.A.
The United States Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals recently released an opinion affirming a federal district court’s decision to award a Colorado accident victim a $2.25 million verdict against his auto insurance company. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
They purchased these policies from Affirmative Insurance Company (“Affirmative”) and National Insurance Company (“National”) (collectively referred to as “Defendants”). [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:44 am by Hector E. Lora
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit recently affirmed summary judgment in favor of an insurance company, holding that the insurer had no duty to defend and indemnify its insured in a lawsuit alleging that the provider’s telemarketing phone calls violated several federal and state laws, because statutory damages and injunctive relief under Read more → Hector E. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 10:15 am by The Lawrence Law Group
Yesterday, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed Florida’s longstanding legal principle that an insurer may have to pay as much as 2.5 times the usual attorney fee when a homeowner has to sue his or her own insurance company and wins. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 9:27 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The plaintiff’s own insurance company then sought dismissal of the case against it as well, arguing that since the plaintiff no longer had a right to recover from the at-fault driver, the insurance company could no longer be held liable. [read post]