Search for: "Al Bahlul v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
Jack reflected on the significance of military commissions, particularly in light of some of last week’s events in the United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
Next up are hearings for another military commission case, United States v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:22 pm
United States. [read post]
6 May 2013, 12:51 pm
Al-Bahlul’s letter says as follows: Defense counsel quickly followed Al-Bahlul’s letter with a letter of its own, which it filed filed today. [read post]
4 May 2013, 8:00 am
Circuit issued an order in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 5:04 pm
As Raff noted last week, the lawyers for the defendant-appellant in United States v. al-Bahlul–the military commission case in which the D.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court of the Unites States ruled in the 2004 decision of Rasul v. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 11:00 am
Wells noted details from a New York Times account of an initial hearing in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:30 am
United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:54 am
It thus appears that a majority of the court’s seven active judges wish to explore the rulings of two three-judge panels, one in Al-Bahlul and another in a closely related case, United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Anticipating what a victory for same-sex advocates could mean in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 10:09 am
As Steve noted on Tuesday, the government petitioned for rehearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:03 pm
” The Hamdan ruling, the document went on, “adversely affects the military commission sysem that Congress established to try and punish al Qaeda terrorists and other alien enemy belligerents who committed offenses in the context of hostilities against the United States before 2006. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:12 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 12:18 pm
United States, 696 F.3d 1238 (D.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:14 am
Fresh from a security scrub are these two items in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:55 am
United States, which is currently pending appeal. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:40 pm
Reported on Friday by the Miami Herald’s Carol Rosenberg: defense attorneys in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:29 am
Yesterday, in another case, Al-Bahlul v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:41 am
Ben beat me to it, but this morning, the D.C Circuit issued a terse order removing United States v. [read post]
