Search for: "Alexander v. Alexander" Results 101 - 120 of 3,192
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm by Jim Lindgren
Second, Alexander Hamilton himself said in his brief for the United States in Hylton v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by Beatrice Yahia
Alexander Cornwell reports for Reuters. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am by Beatrice Yahia
Alexander Ward and Matt Berg report for POLITICO. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 General Motors Corp., 624 F.2d 1373 (5th Cir. 1980) Alexander v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am by Beatrice Yahia
Frank Thorp V and Megan Lebowitz report for NBC News. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 6:41 am by Christopher J. Walker
Sunstein The Administrative Origins of Mandatory Disclosure by Alexander I. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
Trinidad and Tobago Former Progressive Empowerment Party (PEP) political leader Phillip Edward Alexander has been ordered to pay T$850,000 (£100,000) damages to Patriotic Front political leader Mickela Panday for defamation. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Gregory Bacon (Bristows)
Multiple parallel cases This was an interesting feature of the Ocado v AutoStore litigation. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm by Jim Lindgren
It is true that Alexander Hamilton and one Supreme Court Justice, Samuel Chase in Hylton v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 4:18 am by Chloe Dickson (Bristows)
On 25 October 2023, HHJ Hacon (sitting as a High Court Judge), rendered his judgment in Philip Morris v Nicoventures[1]. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
The threshold of seriousness Master Bell reflected upon two notable cases, Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] 1 WLR 1985. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The complaint alleges that during the class period, the defendants made false or misleading statements or failed to disclose that: “(i) DocGo’s executive hiring processes were inadequate to fully review and vet the professional and academic backgrounds of job candidates; (ii) the foregoing increased the likelihood of disruptive executive turnover; (iii) contrary to representations to investors, DocGo had overstated the efficacy of its mobile health and medical transportation services,… [read post]