Search for: "Alvarez v. Alvarez" Results 101 - 120 of 1,334
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2022, 3:15 pm by Daniel S. Blynn
Well, the first FTSA decision issued yesterday, March 10, 2022, in an oral ruling from the bench in Alvarez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
Martinez, Alex Verdugo, Xander Bogaerts, Hunter Renfroe, Christian Vázquez, Kike Hernandez, Bobby Dalbec, Christian Arroyo). [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 1:58 pm
You can see why Justice Perluss comes out the way he does in this case. given the questions that were asked and the way the issues were framed.But the questions that aren't answered are, in my mind, at least as important as the ones that are asked and answered.(1) The Court of Appeal squarely holds that the first question that the prosecution asked at trial didn't violate Miranda because, technically, the question was simply "Did you ask the defendant if the bag was his? [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Keenan, decided Feb. 5 by the Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct but just posted on Westlaw (some paragraph breaks and numbering deleted); the opinion is signed by members Ruth Reukauf, Robert Alsdorf, Ramon Alvarez, Wanda Briggs, Kristian Hedine, Rich Melnick, and Michael Tate: At all times pertinent hereto, Judge Keenan was a Superior Court Judge [in the civil department] for King County, Washington…. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., 958 F.3d 341, 350 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc) (Ho, J., concurring) (judges should follow legal texts "to the maximum extent that Supreme Court precedent permits") (citing Alvarez v. [read post]