Search for: "Ames v. DHS"
Results 101 - 120
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
Last Friday, the Solicitor General filed a self-described “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 6:00 pm
., v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 5:51 am
Citing DHS v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
This post will recount my recent experience waiting on the bar line for DHS v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
And in Part II, I recounted my experience waiting on the bar line for DHS v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 6:12 pm
That tracking number matches the tracking number in DHS's records of the Microraptor shipment. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 5:49 am
But here’s what the office said as it went on: In Brandenburg v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 12:30 pm
DHS: We have no idea if that's true. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:32 am
(For the record, I am a registered independent, and as a retired military officer do not publicly support any candidate.) [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:19 am
” Arizona v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:05 am
I am familiar with this approach, because I employed it in 2016 to attend oral arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm
The risk of processing in congregate settings is a function of DHS’s own practices and policies; it is also not unique to land borders. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
While I am gratified to see some Republicans reverse course and embrace a broadly correct view of the Constitution’s impeachment provisions, Mayorkas’s critics nonetheless fail to make even a colorable case for impeachment employing that standard. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
McRae and Webster v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:57 am
This is probably of great importance, and almost certainly more significant than the write-up that I am giving it suggests. [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:03 am
You would have had to wait until 1967, in Katz v. [read post]
