Search for: "Amicus Appendix"
Results 101 - 120
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2011, 8:39 am
Here are the other briefs filed in this matter pending before the Supreme Court: Appellant's Brief and Appellant's Appendix and Index, filed August 29, 2011; Brief and Appendix of Respondent (State of Minnesota Prosecution Liaison Counsel), filed September 28, 2011; Respondent's Brief and Appendix (Commissioner of Public Safety), filed October 3, 2011; Brief and Appendix of Amicus Curiae, CMI of Kentucky, Inc., filed October 10, 2011; and,… [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
(David Kopel) Very early next year–in time for 2d semester classes in the 2011-12 academic year–Aspen Publishers will publish the first law school textbook on the the Second Amendment. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm
Second, the Court now specifies which appendix items should be included on paper. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
Therasense, now Abbott, got into a patent battle involving 5,820,551 and similar patents claiming "disposable blood glucose test strips for diabetes management. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:47 pm
Along with the requisite hard copies, the Seventh Circuit requires an electronic copy of the brief and appendix. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm
Does 1-500 - Brief of Amicus Curiae... [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:38 am
(Todd Zywicki) Speaking of amicus briefs, shortly before Christmas Josh Wright and I filed a brief in support of a petition for certiorari in an appeal from the 5th Circuit’s decision in Wine Country Gift Baskets.com v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:49 am
The case library: * Public Citizen's motion (with Marty Schwimmer and me) to intervene and request to unseal the joint appendix. * Rosetta Stone reply brief. * Public Citizen amicus brief in support of Google. * Public Knowledge/EFF amicus brief in support of Google. * eBay/Yahoo amicus brief in support of Google. * Google's opening response brief: redacted and unredacted (warning: 60MB file). * UK Intellectual Property Law Society amicus brief… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 2:59 pm
Unfortunately, it took Rosetta Stone so long to file its unsealed brief that there was not enough time for amici supporting Google to digest the newly revealed facts before their amicus briefs were due). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
One problem in preparing the amicus brief was that all of the evidence on which Rosetta Stone's appeal (and Google's response) is based has been submitted under seal -- thirteen volumes of the fifteen volume joint appendix are under seal. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:27 pm
And you can see the Joint Appendix by clicking here. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 8:06 am
For the same reason, the public needs to be able to see the Joint Appendix in order to understand the parties’ arguments and the Fourth Circuit’s decision. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:13 pm
Final EIS at Appendix 1. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:45 pm
We could easily have produced a book twice as long (it ended up at 262 pages, not counting the Appendix, which consists of excerpts from the amicus briefs filed in Roe.) [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 9:09 pm
(For underlying data, see Appendix B of my amicus brief in Heller.) [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 10:27 pm
The brief follows a recommendation from the Intellectual Property Law (IPL) committee of the Association, identified as ABA Report with Recommendation #107B (Policy adopted August 2009), included with the brief as an appendix. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:02 pm
The most recent round of criticism of Elena Kagan involves her claimed role in the medical debate over the procedure known as Intact D&X, which pro-life advocates refer to as partial-birth abortion. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
Appendix A – Related Patent Commentary by Erik J. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:56 pm
These include 20 amicus briefs – 8 supporting the petitioner and 12 supporting the respondent. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:05 pm
. - Changes to Rules 26 and 34.1 clarify what is to be included on the cover of the Joint Appendix and require the counsel of record to include an e-mail address on the cover of every document filed. - An addition to Rule 34 requires a descriptive index of the appendices and citations to the United States Code whenever available. - Revisions to Rule 37 clarify that only an attorney admitted to practice before the Court is permitted to file an amicus curiae brief and that extensions… [read post]
