Search for: "Anderson v. Houston"
Results 101 - 113
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2008, 3:37 pm
Dec. 7, 2006)(Anderson) (gas contract, breach of contract, unfair trade practices, UDJA, attorney fees) Disposition: AFFIRMED AS MODIFIEDOpinion by Justice AndersonPanel members: Before Chief Justice Hedges, Judge Murphy, Justice AndersonCause number in the court of appeals and link to docket: 14-05-00010-CV Full case style in the Houston court of appeals: Apache Corporation v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:23 am
Anderson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
GENERAL TERRAZZO SUPPLIES, INC.; from Harris County; 1st district (01-06-00449-CV, 243 SW3d 84, 07-12-07)08-0159 CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
., ABPP, from Houston Texas. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:37 am
Anderson in Houston, Texas (not to be confused with the Portland, Oregon, case Atlantic v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
Box 61592 Houston, TX 77208 Phone: 713/812-3116 Attention Deficit Disorders Association - Southern Region (ADDA-SR) 12345 Jones Road, Suite 287-7 Houston, TX 77070 Phone: (281) 897-0982 E-mail: addaoffice@pdq.net Web: http://www.adda-sr.org Autism Texas Society for Autistic Citizens 3012 Pacifica Carrollton, Texas 75007 Phone: (972) 245-0727 E-mail: integrity@excelonline.com FEAT-Houston, Inc. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:08 am
Anderson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
Panetti v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 2:18 pm
Anderson has this article on Watson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
Anderson also has this article in the Journal on the Court's request for the federal government's views in Quanta Computer Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
The 6-3 ruling in California v. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 6:16 am
Kaufman was disbarred.COLIN KELLY KAUFMAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
That is not the issue of proportionality as such - proportionality as such is the situation where a commander, without any special or extra intent of wanton and depraved destruction, was nonetheless found liable under the laws of war for destruction because the court simply found it disproportionate as such.)The full declaration from which this is drawn can be found on SSRN, here, and the reply declaration to the plaintiffs experts (Michael Reisman and I were experts for the defendant corporations,… [read post]
