Search for: "Any Person or Entity Claiming any interest therein"
Results 101 - 120
of 184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
Unlike the normal service requirements set forth elsewhere in the Rules, Fed.R.Civ.P. 71.1(d)(3)(A) mandates personal service by mail on all persons having, or claiming to have, an interest in the property for which the addresses are known and within the U.S. or its territories. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 8:31 am
Now here's the interesting part, where the Court looked at the involvement of industry: The Government urges that the codes will "consist of rules of competition deemed fair for each industry by representative members of that industry—by the persons most vitally concerned and most familiar with its problems. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 8:24 am
“A statement which was at the time of its making so far contrary to the declarant’s pecuniary or proprietary interest, or so far tended to subject the declarant to civil or criminal liability, or to render invalid a claim by the declarant against another, that a reasonable person in the declarant’s position would not have made the statement unless believing it to be true. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The motion to dismiss applies only to the Megaupload Limited corporation itself — it does not pertain to Kim Dotcom, or the other individual defendants, personally, nor does it pertain to Vestor Limited, the other corporate defendant indicted.3 Corporations, as separate entities, have long been held liable for criminal actions. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
That all depends on what the practitioner is doing and claiming. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
“When phonorecords of a nondramatic musical work have been distributed to the public in the United States under the authority of the copyright owner, any other person … may, by complying with the provisions of this section, obtain a compulsory license to make and distribute phonorecords of the work. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:01 pm
Conclusion and Takeaways In response to the decision, interested parties have voiced differing views. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
First, the FTCA doesn’t waive sovereign immunity if the claim arises “in respect of . . . the detention of . . . property by . . . any . [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:57 pm
Obviously, plans and their sponsors, insurers and fiduciaries can expect to pay additional plan expenses necessary to pay wrongfully denied benefits and other expenditures these plan or its fiduciaries expend to investigate, defend and resolve claims or compliance audits, investigations, litigation or actions brought by the Departments, state insurance regulators with respect to state governments or insurers, or private litigation by participants or beneficiaries. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
Except as specified in Section 203 of the DGCL, an interested stockholder is defined to include: (a) any person that is the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation or is an affiliate or associate of the corporation and was the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation, at any time within three years immediately prior to the relevant date; and (b) the affiliates and associates of any such… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
But the Peach State could lay claim to more bankruptcy cases -- and millions of dollars in legal and court fees -- that now end up in U.S. bankruptcy courts in Tennessee. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
In the interest of continuity, Debtor names Mr. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:32 am
While such productions cast little glory on the companies that produce them, I cannot find any authority in the cases to date that permit a court to conclude that allegations of deficiencies in themselves automatically require a forensic search whenever a party claims that there are, for example, fewer e-mails from a person or about a subject or transmitted in a given time than the party expected to find. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 2:32 am
While such productions cast little glory on the companies that produce them, I cannot find any authority in the cases to date that permit a court to conclude that allegations of deficiencies in themselves automatically require a forensic search whenever a party claims that there are, for example, fewer e-mails from a person or about a subject or transmitted in a given time than the party expected to find. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:32 am
While such productions cast little glory on the companies that produce them, I cannot find any authority in the cases to date that permit a court to conclude that allegations of deficiencies in themselves automatically require a forensic search whenever a party claims that there are, for example, fewer e-mails from a person or about a subject or transmitted in a given time than the party expected to find. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 9:48 am
This is not to say however that the prosecution of such claims will not pose some interesting questions. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
"For cause" is defined as acts of "personal dishonesty, gross negligence, or willful misconduct that has a material adverse effect on the Corporation, its business operations, financial condition, assets, prospects or reputation" or that "materially breached any fiduciary duty to the Corporation involving personal profit. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
I then asked a more specific question: Had the U.S. government, as an entity client, consented generally to the disclosure of the information contained therein, and the communications revealed, pursuant to attorney-ethics confidentiality rules? [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm
The primary concern is that persons who exercise managerial functions or have regular access to confidential collective bargaining or labour relations information would be placed in a conflict of interest if they were included in the bargaining unit. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 8:07 pm
In any given case, the appointed trustee may request additional information. [read post]
