Search for: "Application of Babcock"
Results 101 - 111
of 111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2009, 2:37 pm
Legal Analysis The court discussed the procedural distinction made between applications for a TRO compared to a preliminary injunction. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:05 pm
Parnham was represented in the civil suit by Dallas attorney Chip Babcock--who is also representing Keller in the ethics inquiry into her conduct in a death penalty case.And:"At a minimum, she should have disclosed the conflict to applicant and the other members of the Court," Shaffer's latest filing says. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 4:06 am
Plaintiff’s counsel then moved for summary judgment as to “(1) whether the bars failed to pay the applicable minimum wage under circumstances in which the bars were not permitted to claim a tip credit; and (2) whether the bars failed to pay overtime as required by the FLSA. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:08 pm
Even some judges say the applicable law is so broad that it can be used to send almost anyone with a sex-crime conviction to the MSOP.... [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 5:43 am
The result has been predictable; a surge in bad applications. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:27 am
Babcock and Wilcox Co. (1988) and State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
by Sandra Babcock; Human Rights / American Bar Association; November 04, 2007The debate over capital punishment in the United States--be it in the courts, in state legislatures, or on nationally televised talk shows--is always fraught with emotion. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
by Sandra Babcock; Human Rights / American Bar Association; November 04, 2007The debate over capital punishment in the United States--be it in the courts, in state legislatures, or on nationally televised talk shows--is always fraught with emotion. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 8:03 am
The application is available here on the judiciary website. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 11:50 am
PSS Systems customers include Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Babcock & Brown, Cap Gemini, First Data Corp, and others. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
" Chairman Battista and Member Schaumber, with Member Walsh dissenting in part, reversed the judge's findings that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) by the statements about striker replacement made by Supervisor Johnson on Aug. 5, 2000; by Rojas' Oct. 1 statement that all unions do is take employees' money; by Respondent's CEO Walter Beck's alleged solicitation of grievances at an Oct. 1 employee meeting; by Rojas' Oct. 1 alleged threats of job loss,… [read post]
