Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey"
Results 101 - 120
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2017, 8:50 am
New Jersey. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:37 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:55 am
” Eighteen years ago, in Apprendi v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:00 pm
Southern Union filed a petition for a writ of certiorari - arguing that Sixth Amendment principles as interpreted in Apprendi v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:33 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), which applies to mandatory minimums under Alleyne, are waived when the defendant pleads guilty. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:17 pm
New Jersey. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:18 am
New Jersey that the maximum sentence which can be imposed for a crime is that based on facts found by a jury? [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 5:14 am
§ 922(g)(1).HELD: Under Apprendi v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:02 am
United States, 527 U.S. 1 (1999), and that the most analogous error, Apprendi v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 1:37 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:25 pm
Supreme Court should have advised the jury that it could consider the evidence for the possession of stolen property counts, but that it could not consider the prior burglaries with respect to the attempted burglary and possession of burglar's tools counts.The Court also arguably acknowledged, sub silentio, that the viability ofthe persistent felony statute is uncertain (it declined to reach theissue), even though the Court of Appeals has consistently upheld thestatute against… [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:32 am
Fairley, which also features language addressing Apprendi v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:20 am
New Jersey, which held that the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial in criminal cases prohibits a judge from deciding facts that increase a criminal defendant’s maximum potential sentence. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:56 am
Apprendi v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:46 am
NEW JERSEY, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), JONES v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm
Of course, those "tired arguments" were eventually accepted by the Supreme Court in Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]), Blakely v Washington (542 US 296 [2004]) and Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]). [read post]
16 Jun 2005, 11:00 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)), and/or the mandatory minimums (implicating Harris v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
”) Apprendi New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) (“Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the statutory prescribed maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 3:29 am
In Apprendi v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 3:49 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), line of cases to reach that result. [read post]
