Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Office of the Courts" Results 101 - 120 of 970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Supreme Court to hear the case, and the Ninth Circuit has issued a stay order until final disposition by the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 May 2010, 8:52 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) While controversy rages over Arizona’s recently passed illegal immigration law, the Supreme Court is considering whether to hear a legal challenge to an earlier Arizona immigration measure signed into law by then-Governor Janet Napolitano, and wants to hear the Solicitor General’s views. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:11 pm
Scott, Court Services Division, Arizona Administrative Office of the Courts sent the following additional material related to the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm by Steve Honig
  Immigration The second leading and as yet undecided case before the Supreme Court is the Arizona “show me your papers” law which requires the police, upon any otherwise permissible detaining of a person (including for example running a red light), if that officer also has a “reasonable suspicion to believe” that a person is in the country illegally, to ask the detainee to prove his legality (green card or some such). [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:00 am by Bill Raftery
However, I’ve had numerous readers request information and in many cases indigent defense systems are under the direct control/jurisdiction of the courts, the supreme court, the administrative office of the courts, etc. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
Streett is an associate in the Houston office of Baker Botts LLP, and a member of the firm's Appellate and Supreme Court Practice. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:50 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
So too have several administrative law professors confirmed the legal doctrine of prosecutorial in their amici curiae brief to the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 3:33 pm by Amy Howe
But it left open the possibility that if the Biden administration failed to defend the rule while it remains in effect, the states and medical groups could return to court, including the Supreme Court if necessary. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 11:00 pm
Checkpoints have been challenged as unconstitutional but the US Supreme Court in 1990 ruled 6-3 they do not violate the Fourth Amendment guarding against unlawful searches and seizures. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
In that post, I had noted an Arizona Attorney Magazine cover that featured Jeff Schrade, who heads up Education Services at the Supreme Court Administrative Office of the Courts (say that five times fast). [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:22 am by Kent Scheidegger
"The Supreme Court held that it did not need to resolve the jurisdictional question, because the agency discretion rationale was clear. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 2:30 pm
The Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court created a taskforce last month to address the issue. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:47 am by Lyle Denniston
Solicitor General for five years led the legal defense in the Supreme Court of some of the Obama administration’s most important policies and programs, will leave office on June 24, according to an announcement Thursday by Attorney General Loretta E. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 11:00 pm
Checkpoints have been challenged as unconstitutional but the US Supreme Court in 1990 ruled 6-3 they do not violate the Fourth Amendment guarding against unlawful searches and seizures. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:47 am by Bill Raftery
Most state constitutions explicitly grant their state courts of last resort the power to establish rules of practice, procedure, and/or administration for the state’s judiciary, including judiciary-related organs such as administrative offices of the courts, judicial disciplinary commissions, etc. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 9:30 am by azatty
Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Scott Bales announces the formation of the 18-member Commission on Access to Justice. [read post]