Search for: "Armour v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am by Marie Louise
Kurian – the Patent Office’s ‘knight in shining armour’ – resigns as the Controller General (Spicy IP) Reforming the patents & trademarks adjudication mechanism in India – Why does the Indian IP Bar continue to sleep? [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am by Marie Louise
(IP Dragon) DuPont learns that global IP theft doesn’t stop at the border (China Hearsay) Europe The chocolate menagerie: General Court decides on bunny, reindeer and mouse shapes: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v OHIM (jiplp) ECJ rules on legislative limitations on copyright protection for designs in Europe: Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (jiplp) AG delivers opinion in Viking Gas A/S v BP Gas A/S concerning trade mark law and refilling of… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:12 am by lpbncontracts
In an opinion unsealed on January 10, 2011, the Court of Federal Claims rejected Armour of America's breach of contract claims and granted judgement to the United States on its counterclaims in Armour of America v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am by Fiona de Londras
This past week we’ve seen the difficulties associated with using private companies and making these companies accountable come into sharp relief in the United States with the latest installation in the case of Mohammed et al v Jeppesen Dataplan. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 11:48 am
Any business in Canada's oil & gas sector who were/are doing business with Iran needs to look at the new rules as the landscape has changed dramatically. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Cadbury Adams USA LLC (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) State Tort claim preempted by patent claim where pleading of bad faith did not meet Iqbal standards: Viskase Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 5:57 pm by D. Daniel Sokol
Volume 2009, no. 6Articles“Law and Finance”: Inaccurate, Incomplete, and ImportantRuth V. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:36 am by M Bates
"Now, for those of you thinking that hockey equipment could be "body armour", well, you're right, but the State has thankfully decided to exempt sports equipment from the Act. [read post]