Search for: "Arnold v. D" Results 101 - 120 of 579
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday’s second argument was in Barr v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed at The Appeal, Jay Willis calls Barton v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
In Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am by Alex Woolgar
This is largely derived from the reasoning of Lord Wilberforce in General Tire v Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Limited [1975] 2 All ER 173 – a patent case in which it was held that "[d]amages should be liberally assessed but.. the object is to compensate the plaintiffs and not punish the defendants".The court is looking for the royalty which "would have been arrived at in negotiations between the parties, had each been making reasonable use of their… [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:04 am
The all-day session will be held on 5 February 2020 in Room MR080, University of Geneva, Bd du Pont d'Arve, 1211 Genève 4. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 5:43 am
The case concerned the unauthorised use of the name of Maradona on a jersey by D&G. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm by sydniemery
Colorado is cited in the following article: Ryan D. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
Monday’s second case is Georgia v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm by Giles Peaker
That said, I was somewhat surprised at the weakness of some (not all) of their arguments – ‘the agreement can’t mean X because that would not be a good agreement for us’ was surely never going to be a flyer in the face of Arnold v Britton [2015] AC 1619, for instance. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]