Search for: "Ashcroft " Results 101 - 120 of 2,465
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2007, 3:42 pm
Ashcroft argues that since the government came by and told the telecoms that government thought that its innovative, unsupervised, and secret spy programs were legal, the telecoms that then volunteered to join in should not be responsible for their violations of federal and state privacy laws protecting the contents and records of Americans' calls and emails. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:40 pm by Ashby Jones
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a case in which a private citizen sued former Attorney General John Ashcroft over allegations that Ashcroft abused federal law to lock up a U.S. citizen as a "material witness. [read post]
17 May 2007, 11:31 am
They wanted Ashcroft to sign off on the secret National Security Agency wiretapping program, a program that Ashcroft had already decided to reject before falling ill. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 11:10 am
On May 18th, 2009 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Marc Spindelman (Ohio State University), A Dissent from the Many Dissents from Attorney General Ashcroft’s Interpretation of the Controlled Substances Act, 19 Issues in L. [read post]
13 Jul 2004, 4:56 am
Attorney General John Ashcroft has asked the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider its decision in favor of Oregon's Death with Dignity Act, which allows terminally ill patients with less than six months to live to request a lethal dose of drugs. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 12:27 pm
[JURIST] Personal notes [PDF text] by FBI Director Robert Mueller released Thursday reveal that former US Attorney General John Ashcroft [official profile] was "feeble, barely articulate, [and] clearly stressed" when current Attorney General and then-White House counsel Alberto Gonzales confronted him in his hospital room in March 2004 to obtain reauthorization of the warrantless domestic [read post]
17 Feb 2004, 4:30 am
A federal prosecutor in Detroit has launched a rare whistleblower lawsuit against Attorney General John Ashcroft, saying that the US Department of Justice interfered in a recent prosecution, displayed "gross mismanagement" of the war on terror, and then retaliated against him when he brought his concerns to the attention of a Senate committee. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:46 am by Zach Zagger
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd [Cornell LII Backgrounder] that a witness in a terror investigation cannot challenge the constitutionality of an objectively reasonable arrest pursuant to a validly obtained warrant even if the government did not call or had no intention of calling the witness for trial. [read post]
20 May 2009, 8:52 am
Supreme Court case involving Javaid Iqbal who was never charged with any 9/11-related terrorism, but nevertheless, suffered inhumane treatment in federal prison for months, and sought to hold former Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI director Robert S. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:31 am by traceydennis
“The Conservative leadership is today accused of being “evasive and obfuscatory” over the tax status of Lord Ashcroft, the party’s deputy chairman and biggest donor, in a ruling by the information commissioner that sharply criticises the secrecy over where he is resident for tax purposes. [read post]
20 May 2007, 2:32 pm
Ashcroft was the public face of an administration pushing the boundaries of the Constitution to hunt down terrorists, but behind the scenes, according to former aides and White House officials, he at times resisted what he saw as radical overreaching.Read more here. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:32 am by Ted Frank
SCOTUSblog: "The Court limited its review of the new terrorism case (Ashcroft v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:00 pm
Daily Kos: John Ashcroft Yelled at Me Tonight. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:27 am by traceydennis
Bradford & Bingley plc v Ashcroft [2010] EWCA Civ 223; [2010] WLR (D) 74  ”There was no need to re-analyse a part-payment of a mortgage debt or to put a gloss on it in terms of acknowledgment for the purposes of calculating whether or not the limitation period had expired because s 29(5) of the Limitation Act 1980 made provision for a freestanding mechanism for the computation of time. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:39 pm by Orin Kerr
Ashcroft: Is Pretextual Use of the Material Witness Statute Unconstitutional? [read post]