Search for: "Assignment of Cases v." Results 101 - 120 of 14,532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2017, 1:08 pm by Trev Peterson
The Nebraska Supreme Court continued its precedent preventing non-attorneys from representing entities in Zapata v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 12:29 pm by Steven M. Regan
H.B. 942 is a response to Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
A case appearing on my radar, though one that may not excite many readers is Landlord Protect Limited v St Anselm Development Company Limited [2009] EWCA Civ 99. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:09 am
Someone today was searching for "secured creditor v qualified assignment structured settlement" on Google and arrived at Structured Settlements 4Real. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 8:43 am by Chip Merlin
An article in the Insurance Journal, New Hampshire Body Shop Owner ‘Winging’ Own Case Beats State Farm in High Court, about an assignment of benefits (AOB) case caught my attention. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 12:15 pm by John McFarland
In December last year, the Texas Supreme Court wrote on that case, No. 17-0332, Barrow-Shaver Resources v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:15 am by Workplace Prof
UPS, a case concerning whether a pregnant woman denied a light duty accommodation under a policy that accommodated injuries caused on the job with light duty assignments, but did not... [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
Assigning a disabled police officer to a “desk job” held to be a reasonable accommodationKeever v Middletown, 145 F.3d 809According to the U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:27 am by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
The various dangers involved in this assignment — namely, the assignment of a legal malpractice claim to a former adversary — have been amply discussed in cases prohibiting such claims as contrary to public policy. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 12:29 pm by Steven M. Regan
H.B. 942 is a response to Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Donald Zuhn -- On March 25, the Federal Circuit in Dawson v. [read post]