Search for: "BNSF Railway Co."
Results 101 - 120
of 171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2016, 1:44 pm
Gibson also said that the FAA’s Pathfinder initiative is making progress in the areas of rail, power lines, agriculture, and more to push beyond visual line of sight, such as drones being able to quickly observe BNSF Railway derailments. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 12:32 pm
BNSF Railway Co. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:23 am
BNSF Railway Co., February 8, 2016, Ostby, C.). [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:31 pm
BNSF Railway Co., employees filed a Title VII claim due to the employer’s failure to cover same-sex spouses under its health plan. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:27 am
BNSF Railway Co., ARB No. 13-044, ALJ No. 2012-FRS-20 (ARB June 2, 2015) Final Decision and Order PDF [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Supreme Court’s Bauman opinion was a game changer, and after the false state of Bristol-Myers Squibb, we were pleased with the California Court of Appeal’s opinion in BNSF Railway v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:06 pm
BNSF Railway, No. 017-264234-13 (Tex, Tarrant Co. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
Union Pacific Railroad Co., ARB No. 13-042, ALJ No. 2012-FRS-17 (ARB Mar. 20, 2015). [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 11:20 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:47 am
BNSF Railway Co. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:00 am
Mar. 30, 2015), and BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:06 am
BNSF Railway Co., January 13, 2015, Gale, K.). [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 3:47 pm
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., 765 F.3d 765 (7th Cir. 2014). [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:26 am
BNSF Railway Co., November 20, 2014). [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 8:07 am
However, their claims for benefits under ERISA were dismissed with prejudice because they involved a dispute over the interpretation and application of the terms of a collectively bargained health plan, which was subject to arbitration under the Railway Labor Act (Hall v BNSF Railway Co, September 22, 2014, Martinez, R). [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 8:34 am
BNSF Railway Co - 8/20/14. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 12:44 pm
Haver v BNSF Railway Co. held that the railroad was not liable for “take-home” or “secondary” liability in this regard, and had no duty to warn third parties who might be exposed to asbestos as a result of their operations. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:24 am
The plaintiff was also ordered to provide information on the legal bases for his claims, on treatment sought by health care professionals, and on BNSF employees interviewed on his behalf (EEOC v BNSF Railway Co, June 10, 2014, Gale, K). [read post]
4 May 2014, 6:53 pm
BNSF Railway Co., No. 13-1686 (7th Cir., March 12, 2014). [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 10:51 am
Bend Co., March 3, 2014). [read post]
