Search for: "BOARD OF EDUC. v. STATE BD. OF EDUC."
Results 101 - 120
of 336
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2021, 1:45 pm
Oakland Bd. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:02 am
A state university is an establishment for the purpose of educating the State's young people, supported by the tax revenues of the State's citizens. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Election Bd. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
UPDATE Ministerial v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
UPDATE Ministerial v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Another case, Aures v Buffalo Board of Education, 272 A.D.2d 664, presented a similar situation. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Another case, Aures v Buffalo Board of Education, 272 A.D.2d 664, presented a similar situation. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 8:47 am
Michigan State University Board of Trustees, 944 F.3d 613 (6th Cir. 2019), which deepened a circuit split regarding institutional liability for “deliberate indifference” under Title IX, and Doe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:30 am
Unfortunately, absent abrogation of Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:55 pm
" Hardy v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 6:54 am
Detroit Board of Education, which allowed for mandatory public sector union dues. [read post]
27 May 2020, 9:36 am
Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
In Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm
Even if petitioner was justified in removing the student from the classroom, his actions in locking the boy out of the room, in a state of distress, and leaving him in the hallway without adequate supervision violated school policy (see Matter of Asch v New York City Bd. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
** In Friends of Pine Bush v Planning Bd. of City of Albany (71 AD2d 780), Appellate Division, Third Department, found that "[a]s residents of the city, the individual petitioners are persons aggrieved by a decision of the planning board and thus have standing to bring this proceeding", while in Zehner v Board of Educ. of the Jordan-Elbridge Cent. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]