Search for: "BOOKER STEVENS"
Results 101 - 120
of 151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2007, 12:52 pm
I am sure I have left out other post-Booker head-scratchers that will ensure there is lots to keep me and others plenty busy in the weeks and months ahead. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 12:34 pm
Justice Stevens, the author of Gall, reveals yet again that he can give the defense bar lots of great dicta. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 11:43 am
Justice Stevens, the author of Gall, reveals yet again that he can give the defense bar lots of great dicta. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Though the Kimbrough decision may garner more attention because of the historical controversies over crack sentencing, the Gall decision likely will be the most consequential for post-Booker sentencing realities. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
Steven Kalar, Senior Litigator. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:20 am
Since Booker, this huge issue has been, for the most part, ducked by the circuit courts, which tend to view the post-Booker world as if Blakely and Apprendi never happened. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), particularly in light of the language in Justice Stevens' opinions at pages 240 and 278 and Justice Breyer's opinion in Booker at page 251.Upon the filing of the en banc petition, the three members of the panel will strongly recommend that the full court grant the en banc petition to review this important question. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 6:40 am
For some interesting stats on Montana "ice," visit the Montana Meth project at [www.montanameth.org] .Steven Kalar, Senior Litigator N.D. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), particularly in light of the language in Justice Stevens' opinions at pages 240 and 278 and Justice Breyer's opinion in Booker at page 251. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:01 pm
EDITORS' OBSERVATIONS Steven L. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:42 pm
The particular question presented is whether, in the wake of the holding of Booker v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Booker. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 8:10 am
King , Fred Cheesman & Brian Ostrom Why Sentencing by a Judge Fulfills the Right to Jury Trial: A Comparative Law Look at Blakely and Booker by Susan F. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 10:07 am
United States, --- U.S. --- , 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2465 (2007); see also id. at 2470-71 (Stevens, J., concurring) ("Simply stated, Booker replaced the de novo standard of review required by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 11:35 am
The appeal bespeaks a misunderstanding of federal sentencing law under the regime created by the Booker decision. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:05 am
In that concurring opinion, Justice Stevens notes that he did not agree with the remedial part of the Booker decision, but is now bound to it by stare decisis. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:53 am
In this recent, tragic case, a female cooperator got ten years based on District Court Judge Haddon's repeated and erroneous view that Booker eliminated the Safety Valve. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:44 pm
") is in all likelihood on his way to prison in a few weeks.Justice Stevens started off his concurrence with bigger fish to fry, noting that Booker was not unanimous but as precedent must now be accepted as settled law. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 2:46 pm
He has already won the battle fought with Justice Scalia in the Booker majority remedial opinion ("Booker II"). [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:23 am
Although, as Justice Steven noted in his concurrence, Rita's military service "was not mentioned by the District Court in his explanation of his choice of the sentence that defendant received," the majority had no problem affirming the sentence. [read post]
