Search for: "BURGER v. US " Results 101 - 120 of 762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2009, 8:30 am by Richard Goldfarb
  Barbecue manufacturers encourage their customers to use their grills to grill chicken; they are not defendants. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
The basic rationale behind this exclusion is that a carrier should not have to provide coverage to an injured party where, unbeknownst to the carrier, the injured party regularly used another vehicle that was not covered under the carrier’s policy because the carrier was not paid a premium by the injured party to cover that risk.Research reveals that the regular use exclusion has been upheld in Pennsylvania state trial court decisions dating back 65 years, see Burger… [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:28 am
Wade, but also a lesser-known opinion called Chambers v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 11:47 am
Courts recognize this, for instance holding that use of trademarks in parodies is generally unlikely to cause confusion; see, for instance, Lyons Partnership v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
It fell to McDonald’s to prove it had put the mark to genuine use in the EU for a variety of goods in Classes 29, 30 and 42 – including for “meat sandwiches” (ie, burger in a bun). [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:48 pm by Garry Fujita
Burger King uses rice flour for that purpose and requested proposals to supply the rice flour. [read post]