Search for: "Bailey v. Florida"
Results 101 - 119
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2010, 5:03 pm
Bailey v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:05 pm
Bailey v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:08 am
" Gomez follows the reasoning from Bailey v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:37 am
Greenfield's "purported" attorney status is described thusly: Greenfield’s disciplinary resignations, tantamount to disbarment, are reported at The Florida Bar v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:15 am
Ct 2827(6-22-09)Florida v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
We discussed Fields v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Farnes, 697 So.2d 825, 828 (Fla. 1997); Bailey v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et al, 2000) •… [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:13 am
"Plaintiff commenced this action against defendant alleging, among other things, that defendant was vicariously liable for the negligence of Bailey and/or negligently failed to supervise Bailey in filing the notice of claim in Florida. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 21, 2008 US v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:38 pm
Bailey, 488 F.3d 363 (6th Cir. 2007) (decided six months before Gall), and United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 1:41 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 9:35 am
The lethal injection index, with full coverage of Baze v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:30 pm
Wasserman, Why WVU v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:44 am
" Stephanie Bailey v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Bailey, No. 06-5576 Defendant's conviction and sentence for drug- and firearm-related offenses are affirmed over claims that: 1) a prior Kentucky state court conviction for second-degree escape did not qualify for a career offender enhancement; 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions; and 3) the district court erred in enhancing his Guidelines offense level after finding that he had perjured himself at trial. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 01, 2007 Bailey v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Bailey, 878 So.2d 31, 57 (Miss. 2004); Moore v. [read post]
