Search for: "Baker v. Long"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,216
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
Baker, No. 15-497 (U.S., filed Oct. 9, 2015). [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:09 am
”) Smith v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:31 am
The High Court decision of Mr Justice Peart outlined the facts and confirmed something the IPKat has long known: humans are messy creatures, alas. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:31 am
The High Court decision of Mr Justice Peart outlined the facts and confirmed something the IPKat has long known: humans are messy creatures, alas. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:45 am
McCambridge's - the plaintiff in the passing-off action The High Court decision of Mr Justice Peart outlined the facts and confirmed something the IPKat has long known: humans are messy creatures, alas. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 6:08 pm
Perry v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
Chief Justice John Marshall’s tenure and the long reign of justices during the “Lochner Era” are a testament to this reality. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm
First, he concluded that the summary Supreme Court ruling in Baker v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm
Rogers Lumber Co., 173 P. 1046, 1048 (Okla. 1918) (“Statutes such as ours are said to have their origin in the common law rule of ‘journeys account’ ”); Baker v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
Baker are entitled to interest on their $507 million punitive damages award. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
As Justice Powell pointed out long ago, this test is limited only by the scope of a Justice’s imagination. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
As Justice Powell pointed out long ago, this test is limited only by the scope of a Justice’s imagination. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
LONG. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 8:32 am
Gore has encouraged federal courts to policy election administration more agressively, see this article by Dan Tokaji and Owen Wolfe from the Case Western Reserve Law Review symposium on Baker v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
He also cited the case of Baker v Baker [1993] EWCA Civ 17 in support of this argument where it was held that the remarks by Scarman LJ should not be interpreted to suggest that the court necessarily had to place the minimum value on the disappointed interest. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 12:22 pm
How long will it be before privacy groups blame the Seattle Seahawks’ loss on NSA’s policy of intercepting everything? [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm
This morning’s long-delayed oral argument in Microsoft v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:30 pm
This morning the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the long-running Exxon-Valdez case, Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:56 pm
CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]
