Search for: "Baker v. Municipal Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Although a demand for retroactivity of wages and benefits is generally a mandatory subject of negotiations under the Act and arbitrable under §204.9(g) of the Act, the Association asserted that the joint employer’s proposal was prohibited based upon the rationale in the Appellate Division, Third Department’s decision in Baker v Board of Education, Hoosick Falls Central School District, 3 AD3d 678, 37 PERB ¶7502 (3d Dept 2004). [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:41 pm
” Long relegated to “constitutional desuetude,” the Guarantee Clause has experienced a sort of slow revival over the past half century, beginning with the Court’s allowance in Baker v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:13 am
Div. 1997) (stating “[u]nder the probable intent doctrine, New Jersey courts construe wills to ‘ascertain and give effect to the probable intention of the testator’”) (quoting Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Blaine Baker and Donald Fyson 2012 Arming and Disarming: A History of Gun Control in Canada by R. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
Gus Kwidis of the Beaver County Court of Common Pleas followed suit in Six v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Municipal Court (1989) 49 Cal.3d 74, 88 [260 Cal.Rptr. 520, 776 P.2d 222].) [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:11 am
Its careful analysis of the variety of supposed technological solutions should be mandatory reading for legislators, and I would hope that, the next time a court is assessing the constitutionality of a relevant piece of legislation (as US courts did on a number of occasions re: filtering), that this material (assuming the already-infamous Footnote 17 in Exxon v Baker doesn’t prevent it) can be of assistance there, too. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
It should be noted that Texas made no effort to comply with the one person-one vote mandate of Baker v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 4 March 2015 there was a unilateral statement in open court in the case of Rowland v Mitchell. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:05 am
In general, courts recognize the ability [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
The Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
In Buckley v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
The Supreme Court decided that in Bradley v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 7:30 am
After months of delay, on April 5 the Supreme Court finally granted certiorari and ruled in Biden v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
The second of the new issues that arose deals with the line of cases after the 1962 decision in Baker v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Fuchsberg Law Center, untangles the procedural web woven in the recent US Supreme Court decision in Wallace v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:26 am
Fuchsberg Law Center, untangles the procedural web woven in the recent US Supreme Court decision in Wallace v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/c4h Kolev v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Later this year the Supreme Court of Canada is scheduled to hear the appeal of R. v. [read post]
