Search for: "Baker v. Nelson"
Results 101 - 120
of 208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm
That turned up cases applying the same rationale under federal law: Baker v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:44 pm
Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
The heart of the dissent was its argument that lower courts are still bound by the Supreme Court’s one-line decision in 1972 in the case of Baker v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:53 am
Sullivan, in which the Supreme Court upheld funding and facilities restrictions on women's access to abortion and abortion counseling.The brief also vehemently insists that the federal district court is bound by the "precedent" of Baker v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
In 1972, the United States Supreme Court issued Baker v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 4:46 am
Next is Buck v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
Sullivan, in which the Supreme Court upheld funding and facilities restrictions on women's access to abortion and abortion counseling.The brief also vehemently insists that the federal district court is bound by the "precedent" of Baker v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:57 am
Nelson. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:00 am
Quick Poll: How Does the SEC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:20 pm
Scott Nelson has this post at the Consumer Law & Policy Blog about the Court's unanimous decision in Watson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm
And while neither party asked Callahan to rule on federal constitutional protections, Baker v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 6:54 am
Nelson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:37 pm
But as the dissent points out, far more relevant is the Supreme Court's summary dismissal of the appeal in Baker v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 10:19 am
Hardwick, Baker v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am
Allen, Ethan Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 11:08 am
Bandemer, but Baker v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 1:51 pm
Nelson. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Fla. 1999); Baker v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
After dutifully arguing for four pages that he was bound by the ancient one-line decision from the Supreme Court in Baker v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:40 pm
Nelson as binding precedent. [read post]
