Search for: "Baker v. Nelson" Results 101 - 120 of 184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2012, 7:37 pm
But as the dissent points out, far more relevant is the Supreme Court's summary dismissal of the appeal in Baker v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm by Lyle Denniston
From the point of view of the four states involved in the cases, their lawyers apparently will not be prevented from making arguments on two points to try to help them salvage their bans: first, the Supreme Court settled that issue in a summary ruling in 1972 in the case of Baker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 2:55 pm by Lyle Denniston
The new decision followed the pattern of the widest-ranging recent decisions against same-sex marriage restrictions: * It ruled that the Supreme Court had not already settled the same-sex marriage issue in a one-line summary decision in 1972 (Baker v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:59 am by Lyle Denniston
  For that, they relied on the Justices’ one-line ruling on Oct. 10, 1971, in Baker v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Nelson is binding precedent as to petitioners’ constitutional claims. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm by Dale Carpenter
Under this approach, the Sixth Circuit would consider itself bound by the one-sentence order in 1972’s Baker v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]