Search for: "Ball v. Carr*"
Results 101 - 120
of 530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2014, 2:11 am
No, said the Court, reinstating the decision of the Opposition Division, there was no likelihood of confusion among relevant consumers between products marked GOLDEN BALLS and those marked BALLON D'OR. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
Ball, 2010 Ohio 714, 2010 Ohio App. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:16 pm
Which seems to me totally correct as a policy matter, and which I'll forthrightly concede was present in my mind as I confronted the "purely legal" (balls-and-strikes) question of whether the trails were a public accommodation. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:05 am
I've got no crystal ball, of course. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
In Lamp v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Ball
• US v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:39 am
Conversely, to the recent case Coty v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:02 pm
" Kimble v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
Also like an excessively large box of chocolates, it takes a little while to digest (fur-balls acquired from chocolaty paws notwithstanding). [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
Never too late 31 [week ending Sunday 1 February] -- Women in IP, a MIP’s perspective | Another linking reference to the CJEU | Catarina Holtz on Disciplinary authority over the EPO BoA | EPO pays to say that patent examiners’ life is truly cool | You can’t name your daughter ‘Nutella’ | CJEU in Arne Forsgren v Österreichisches Patentamt | Blocking injunctions in Greece | IPEC and bondage in Haiss… [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:01 pm
Sometime later, Cricbuzz, Idea Cellular and ONMOBILE started SMS services providing contemporaneous ball-by ball coverage of live cricket matches. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
" Creech v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:51 am
Is there any meaningful distinction between legal sufficiency review under Jackson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:34 am
“soccer”, or those-22-guys-hardly-seeking-to-put-the-ball-inside-the-net), says Merpel.* C-490/14 - Verlag Esterbauer: Get off my map! [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:38 am
Farmers v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:50 pm
This post is part of an ACSblog online symposium on oral argument in HHS v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 6:57 am
Harper (Carrie Campbell Severino, National Review) A Brief Guide to Legal Corpus Linguistics, the Unholy Fusion of Big Data and Originalism (James LaRock & Jacob Hammond, Balls and Strikes) The post The morning read for Thursday, Sept. 1 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 10:40 am
On February 24, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Jerry Dillon, et al. v. [read post]
