Search for: "Barnes v. Superior Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
The Court summarily reversed in yet another qualified immunity case, Taylor v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:42 am
Regarding the contract formation, the court starts off strongly by citing the Nguyen v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Barnes v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
SHAK v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:50 am
The Court of Chancery rejected breach of fiduciary duty claims and upheld the poison pill defense that Barnes & Noble implemented as part of a plan to rebuff the hostile efforts of investor Ron Burkle to acquire Barnes & Noble, which is controlled by the Riggio family. [read post]
23 May 2021, 3:24 pm
Rakusen v Jepson borne in mind. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
App. 653, 655 (1948); Barnes v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/Swn Amador v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:00 am
The oldest one is from the Ontario Court of Appeal, McKay v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:55 pm
(This same issue arose in Barnes v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
The differences are important for determining the way in which courts might interpret statutes or apply them. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
Barnes. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Leining v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co… [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am
The rules of court govern every step of your court proceeding, and the judge must manage your court proceeding as the rules require. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands… [read post]
