Search for: "Bartholomew v. Bartholomew"
Results 101 - 120
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2025, 8:17 am
Mark Bartholomew (Buffalo Law) Sam Bayard Prof. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
Ask A Man Who Can – http://bit.ly/NfTBwl (Charles Holloway) Avoid the Pitfalls of Self-Managing eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/Qrd0tX (Andrew Hinkes) Backgrounder Update: Technology Assisted Review Compendium – Feb. 1 – Sept. 10, 2012 – http://bit.ly/IiTGtb (@OrangeLT) Criminal E-Discovery: 21st Century Paperless Trails (Part 3 of 5) http://bit.ly/NmjN8L (Daniel Garrie) Drilling Down Into Texas Electronic Discovery http://bit.ly/PLxRG3 (Timothy Mountz, Charles Strecker)… [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Barnes, Angela Barron, Armando Barron, Chris Bartell, Paul Bartholomew, Katie Basile, Maureen Bastian, Monika Bauer, Karen Baumann, Leah Bausa, Gini Beck, Stephanie Beck, Sandy Becker, Devin Bedwell, James Bell, Matt Bell, Sam Bell, Bob Bello, Tony Bello, Chris Bellomy, Lysa Bellott, Robert L Beneke, John Benicy, Stacy Bennett, Bethany T. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The trial court agreed and declared the regulation invalid, primarily on the ground that the Board of Health exceeded its authority and violated the separation of powers doctrine as set out by the New York Court of Appeals in Boreali v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:00 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during March 2023 Seven consistory court judgments were circulated in March, and these featured Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 1:05 pm
The goal of Campbell was to adopt a general analytical framework that could be used beyond parody v. satire; the distinction is used to focus on the user’s reasons for the use. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
., et al. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
[v]Another element that may cause some misunderstanding of the priorities in a layoff -- the individual may have been appointed to what has been designated a “permanent position” or appointed to position designated a “temporary position. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:59 am
Nolan to Go Out On Limb In Kleen Products Predictive Coding Case - bit.ly/HGgMfD (Matthew Nelson) Proportionality Demystified: How Organizations Can Get eDiscovery Right by Following Four Key Principles – http://bit.ly/IUFds3 (Philip Favro) Redefine Transparency in Predictive Coding: Shoot for Validity - bit.ly/HL7PhL (Gerard Britton) Robinson v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am
California Court Declines to Follow Race Tires, Allows Taxation of eDiscovery Costs - bit.ly/IZoWhW (K&L Gates) Peck Wins By Submission; Parties Get Shot At Title Fight - bit.ly/Jfheio (eLessons Learned) Random Sample Calculations And My Prediction That 300,000 Lawyers Will Be Using Random Sampling By 2022 – bit.ly/IBIaZ5 (Ralph Losey) “Reasonableness” is Key When Assessing E-Discovery Efforts – bit.ly/IZp7d9 (Mike Hamilton) Reducing… [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
My thought: pursue the misuse arguments Posner offered in Ty v. [read post]
