Search for: "Beebe v. State"
Results 101 - 118
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Lemley: think about mental state and the negligence analogy. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm
Our interns, Mitchell Beebe, Elena Botts, Kayla DeAlto, Austin Max Scherer, Teddy David, Jamie Jang, Kenneth Boggess, and Julia V. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm
Our interns, Mitchell Beebe, Elena Botts, Kayla DeAlto, Austin Max Scherer, Teddy David, Jamie Jang, Kenneth Boggess, and Julia V. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:28 am
Kraftwerk v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
No court will go along with this today as stated. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Fox News v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
Barton Beebe has discussed what TM owners do to keep consumers in their place, but it’s very hard to keep them there. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 4:41 pm
The 2006 amendment preempts state and federal dilution actions against federally registered marks, which also helps big TM owners. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
Might work better if claims were confined to copyright v. patent w/r/t software? [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 11:54 am
To what extent is this value created by the public v. the person. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Pallin v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
Presenters often appear to be ill-briefed and insufficiently armed with the facts necessary to challenge assertions made by interviewees in live interviews, reflecting not just pressure on them but a lack of understanding by programme researchers and producers He also pointed to ‘evidence of a misunderstanding of the political process in the EU’, drawing attention in particular to written evidence submitted by the Labour Party which stated that ‘too often it seems that… [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
., Prestonettes v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Related to Barton Beebe’s observations about the sumptuary code, but it’s not directly about class but about control over the message (though it may cash out as class).Laura Heymann: SignificantObjects.com—origin stories written by well known authors for store bought items; sold for $8000 when bought for $1.25 because of the stories associated with those specific iterations. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Earliest surveys—1921 Coca-Cola v. [read post]
