Search for: "Begay v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2009, 11:26 am
Citing Begay v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 7:12 am
" Id. at 4.Most importantly, the Court cited its recent decision in Begay v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 6:55 pm
Additional information is available on the Chambers v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 2:35 pm
§ § 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) under Begay v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
Federal criminal trial lawyer, Russell Mace, also argued that stalking should not be a crime of violence under United States Sentencing Guideline (U.S.S.G) 2K2.1 and 4B1.2 because it does not meet the test set out in the recent Supreme Court decision of Begay v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
Smith now appeals his sentence, challenging whether, after the Supreme Court's recent decision in Begay v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:52 pm
For those of you who like the drama of jousting Justices, Begay v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:32 am
Continuing its somewhat puzzling approach (and voting paterns) in ACCA cases, the Supreme Court today in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
8 May 2008, 1:55 pm
Doug ended his post by noting that "the only thing missing" from my analysis was an assessment of what the Court's ruling in Begay might mean for the soon-to-be-decided United States v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 1:54 pm
Writing over at CO, Anita Krishnakumar has this fantastic new post, titled "Dejá-Vu in Begay v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 11:09 am
United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Supreme Court, April 16, 2008 Begay v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
" - In blank">Begay v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 12:18 pm
And just the other day, in Begay v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 12:18 pm
And just the other day, in Begay v. [read post]
