Search for: "Bell Atlantic Corporation" Results 101 - 120 of 170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2011, 5:30 am
  Citing Bell Atlantic Corp. v, Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), the Court stated that “once the proponent of federal jurisdiction has explained plausibly how the stakes exceed $5,000,000, the case belongs in federal court unless it is legally impossible for the plaintiff to recover that much. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:59 am by The Docket Navigator
In granting in part plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendant's affirmative defenses for failure to state a claim, the court concluded that Bell Atlantic Corporation v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 6:32 am by Amanda Rice
Michigan Bell Telephone Company. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:44 am by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
Instead, the UFCW analogizes the Rule 23 issue to the "plausibility" standard adopted by the Supreme Court in the context of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss in Bell Atlantic Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:44 am by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
Instead, the UFCW analogizes the Rule 23 issue to the "plausibility" standard adopted by the Supreme Court in the context of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss in Bell Atlantic Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 7:51 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Here is part of the abstract:In the attempt to decipher what is required to plead a claim for relief in federal court after the Supreme Court’s decisions in Bell Atlantic Corporation v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:38 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In the attempt to decipher what is required to plead a claim for relief in federal court after the Supreme Court’s decisions in Bell Atlantic Corporation v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:34 pm
Supreme Court's decisions in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Bexis
Ct. 1937 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 10:26 pm by Hank Fasthoff
  After all, HUJ says that it has extensively licensed Einstein’s intellectual property rights, including to companies such as “Apple Computer, Bell Atlantic, Citibank, Columbia Pictures, Daimler-Chrysler, Dell Computers, Deloitte LLP, Disney, Dow Jones & Company, Eastman Kodak, Einstein Noah Bagel Corporation, Epson, France Telecom, Hyundai Motor Company, IBM, Intel Corporation, Johnson & Johnson, Kraft Foods, LegoLand, Mars, Microsoft,… [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:33 am
Supreme Court has stated that “when allegations of parallel conduct are set out . . . they must be placed in a context that raises a suggestion of a preceding agreement, not merely parallel conduct that could just as well be independent action (Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:05 am by site admin
Brook Detterman, Rumors of Conley's Demise Have Been Greatly Exaggerated: The Impact of Bell Atlantic Corporation v. [read post]