Search for: "Bentley v. Bentley" Results 101 - 120 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2021, 2:23 am by CMS
In referring to this case, the appellants submitted that it had been wrongly decided because it was inconsistent with Radcliffe v Bartholomew [1892] 1 QB 161 and was disapproved in both Marren v Dawson Bentley & Co Ltd [1961] 2 QB135  and Pritam Kaur v S Russell and Sons [1973] QB 336. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
Bentley v Bentley: Clothing beats Motors again in the Court of AppealBentley Motors Limited v (1) Bentley 1962 Limited (2) Brandlogic Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 1726 (December 2020) This was the first ever case featured in Retromark and turned up again in Volume 7. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
  Last week in Skinner v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 6:13 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Bentley v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:43 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
" US v Bentley, No. 10-10108-001 (7th Cir 2015). [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 2:57 pm by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
Citizen On Tuesday, the Supreme Court ruled in Ashcroft v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 9:07 am by David Pocklington
This statement of the law was approved by the Court of Arches in Re Bentley Emmanuel Church, Bentley [2006] Fam 39 at [26]. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:44 am
Meanwhile, if the tabloids are correct, my neighbor Teodoro Obiang is hanging out in Malibu at his multi-million dollar hilltop estate overlooking the Pacific Ocean, driving Bentleys and Lamborghinis, and jetting off in his $34 million dollar Gulfstream V to his other homes in Cape Town, Buenos Aires and Paris. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:39 am by Conor McEvily
  Steven Bennett of Jones Day analyzes the Court’s 2010 decision in Rent-A-Center v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:07 am
" However, in the one case where the matter has been argued, the result was inconclusive (Francis Day & Hunter Ltd v Bron [1963] Ch. 587.) [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:08 am by CMS
They relied upon the Court of Appeal authority of Pritam Kaur v S Russell and Sons [1973] QB 336 and the first instance decision in Marren v Dawson Bentley & Co Ltd [1961] 2 QB135, which established that where a cause of action accrues part way through a day, that day should be excluded for limitation purposes. [read post]