Search for: "Bernard v. Does 1-5" Results 101 - 120 of 156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by IP Dragon
Although sections 27(1) and (2) of the Singapore Trade Marks Act (1998) are based on article 5 (1) a-b, EU Trade Marks Directive (Directive 89/104/EEC, December 21, 1988), the Court of Appeal chose to interpret the requirement of trademark use stricter than the European interpretation (which is to look whether the defendant's use is liable to affect the functions of the trademark). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Despite this, a major study conducted as the outbreak was peaking was published in the New England Journal of Medicine [1]. [read post]
30 May 2011, 10:15 am by Thomas Crocker
“ Justice Alito, in his majority opinion in Kentucky v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:57 am
  After the whole thing with Cora was concluded, the estate filed a federal tax refund claim for approximately $5 million. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am by PaulKostro
Layton City, 45 F.3d 369, 372 (10th Cir. 1995); Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5 v. [read post]