Search for: "Bert v State" Results 101 - 120 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm
That was a reference to the opinions by Justices Pleicones and Hearn, who wanted to change the "neutral principles" rule laid down in All Saints Waccamaw to a "complete deference to the national church" rule of Watson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The trial in the case of Graeme Cowper v Fairfax Media Publications is continuing before a McCallum J and a NSW Supreme Court jury. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Almost every newspaper, local and national has carried hysterical and inaccurate pieces setting out doomsday scenarios if section 40 is enacted and consistently misdescribing the Leveson system of audited self-regulation as “state backed” (or even “state”) regulation. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Discussant: Bert Rein, Founding Partner, Wiley Rein Zauderer: easy cases make bad law. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Blix Street’s lead counsel, Bert Deixler, and the Cassidys’ lead counsel, Sun, as well as his co-counsel, Frederick Feldman, were present in court. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Blix Street’s lead counsel, Bert Deixler, and the Cassidys’ lead counsel, Sun, as well as his co-counsel, Frederick Feldman, were present in court. [read post]