Search for: "Beverage v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2014, 3:22 am
SaddleSprings, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 12:30 am
” Saucier v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 1:55 pm
The New York Court of Appeals has ruled in the case of Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 10:45 am
See Ackerman v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 6:26 am
See Ackerman v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 12:07 pm
In Manning v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 1:41 pm
Dugan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:55 am
The plaintiff runs certification programs for beverage experts. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 12:50 pm
In Morales, the Supreme Court stated, "[i]f a statute gives new rights and prescribes new remedies, such remedies must be strictly pursued; and a party seeking a remedy under the act is confined to the remedy conferred thereby and to that only.'" The Court distinguished Morales, noting that the proposition is inapplicable where the statute in question plainly states that it does not provide the exclusive remedy for its violation.The Court further held that,… [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 9:36 am
Lifeway Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 6:47 am
Holk v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:02 am
In Freeman v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:02 pm
Yummy.Flavored malt beverages ("FMBs") can be made in one of two ways. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:54 pm
Khasin v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:54 pm
Khasin v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:31 am
See City of Akron v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 11:34 am
See Franciscan Vineyards, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:02 am
The CCJ noted that this case was similar in circumstances to the previous case of Rudisa Beverages & Juices N.V. and Caribbean International Distributors Inc. v The State of Guyana. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 9:10 am
The dismissal predated the Third Circuit’s decision in Fellner v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:08 pm
Café Concerto Ltd. v New York State Liquor Authority In this Article 78 proceeding, petitioner appealed a determination of the New York State Liquor Authority which imposed a civil penalty for the violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65(1) and State Liquor Authority Rule 54.2. [read post]