Search for: "Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2012, 12:46 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
ColorOfChange and the Center for Media and Democracy have successfully encouraged about a dozen corporations, such as Blue Cross Blue Shield and Coca-Cola to stop sponsoring ALEC. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
Kornowicz's request, acknowledging its legal obligation to recognize her marriage, and passed it on to Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Western New York, the insurance company that provides group health insurance coverage to employees of the school district under a group insurance contract. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 11:58 am by Ronald Mann
Gobeille argues that the burdens here are trivial – the claims administrator for respondent Liberty Mutual (Blue Cross/Blue Shield) already prepares the data that is required, because it provides that data for its non-ERISA operations in Vermont. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (6th Cir. 2016) (noting that "only the most compelling reasons can justify non-disclosure of judicial records. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 9:00 am by Gregory Dell
In Denise Hodges V Prudential Insurance Company of America & Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey (Horizon), the plaintiff Denise Hodges alleged that Prudential had contravened the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) by failing to pay disability benefits to her. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 6:33 pm by Pringletech
  In Beverly Oaks, the U.S. 9th Circuit Appeals Court allowed an out-of-network healthcare provider to assert equitable claims under ERISA seeking a direct recovery of unpaid claims from Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois (BCBS). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:15 am
KeySpan Corporation (CCH Trade Regulation Reporter ¶50,975).In addition, the Division filed civil antitrust lawsuits against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and (together with seven states) against American Express, MasterCard, and Visa.In the first suit, the Division challenged “most-favored nations” (MFN) clauses in Blue Cross’s agreements with hospitals that allegedly limit the discounts the hospitals can… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:34 am by Jared Klaus
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, No. 09-2607 (Aug. 12, 2011), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s decision to certify the class, which would have consisted of between 550 to 875 self-insured plans that entered into Administrative Services Contracts (“ASC’s”) with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (“BCBSM”). [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:21 am by Stephen M. Ozcomert
The plaintiff had a managed health care insurance plan with Blue Cross/Blue Shield (“Blue Cross”). [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Blue Cross Blue Shield, where the plaintiff had nine hostile incidents in 3.5 years. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 9:13 am
    The Court held that Powell had not met her burden to show procedural unconscionability where she did not provide evidence that she could not obtain wireless service without entering into an arbitration provision, which was one of the factors for procedural unconscionability under Blue Cross Blue Shield of Ala. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
The action is notable because it is the first unilateral conduct case brought under Sec. 2 of the Sherman Act in over a decade and because it is the first case brought by the Antitrust Division in the health care sector since the October 2010 civil antitrust lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:32 am by Richard J. Webb
" Eschelman, associate general counsel of Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, dismisses Garcia v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 7:18 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, which basically reads as a mini-treatise on a number of interesting issues arising in ERISA litigation. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
The controlling provisions in the CBA provided that "[a]ll present retirees … and all members who retire in the future shall continue to receive Blue Cross, Blue Shield Major Medical Insurance coverage for themselves and their dependents (or comparable coverage as may then be in effect). [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:28 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Mich., Inc., 740 F.2d 423, 428 (6th Cir. 1984) (holding denial of rule 56(f) motion improper where party moving for summary judgment had not been "extremely forthcoming" with respect to document requests and interlocutory appeal had interrupted discovery); see also 10B Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. [read post]