Search for: "Branch v. United States et al" Results 101 - 120 of 317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
The ABA Business Law Section Backgrounder may be accessed HERE. 1UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMANORTHEASTERN DIVISIONNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS )UNITED, d/b/a the NATIONAL )SMALL BUSINESS )ASSOCIATION, et al., ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) Case No. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB)JANET YELLEN, in her official )capacity as Secretary of the )Treasury, et al., ))Defendants. )MEMORANDUM OPINIONThe late Justice Antonin Scalia once remarked that… [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 4:34 pm
From the Justice Department's January 2002 memo on the Application of Treaties and Laws to al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees, (available here), the exercise of the United States, right to international self-defense under Article 51 of the U.N. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by William Ford
In the first of the three lawsuits filed against Hifter, Elzagally et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm by Josh Blackman
The "Officers of the United States" Are Appointed Positions in the Executive and Judicial Branches, not the President. b. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:27 pm
Solicitor General’s brief in opposition in Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:25 am by Lyle Denniston
The one remaining case on the docket — a case involving more than 150 detainees — is Khadr, et al., v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
  *********************************   I am indebted to John Blancett, partner of law firm SDMA for drawing my attention to a startling decision of the US Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit: Tzvi Weiss et al. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:37 pm by Christa Culver
Ct.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the Council on State Taxation et al.Amicus brief of Market America, Inc.Amicus brief of The Tax Foundation (forthcoming)Petitioner's reply Title: KFC Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]