Search for: "Brave v. Brave" Results 101 - 120 of 916
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2021, 4:39 am by Nancy Rapoport
Some of our students were, in fact, thrilled, but others were not, given her role in Roe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
While the states were seen as “laboratories of democracy” by Justice Brandeis in New State Ice Company v Liebmann – in recent years states have become “laboratories of national partisan politics,” to adopt Jessica Bulman-Pozen’s gloss on Brandeis. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm by Eric Goldman
To my knowledge, the only litigated case that resulted in a 512(f) win was Online Policy Group v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 12:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Holy Roman Emperor Maximillian I had just died, and his grandson Charles V was about to be crowed in Aachen as his successor. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 3:45 am by SHG
A 2012 Supreme Court case, Martinez v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 6:29 pm
Artificial intelligence and machine learning brings another layer of complexity to this brave new world of algorithmic law, especially because of demands for more transparency, the right for an explanation, and for algorithmic auditing.Likewise, courts are already experimenting with digital justice, by moving from Alternative Dispute Resolution to Online Dispute Resolution. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 10:08 am by Jane Turner
Heather McWilliam was born in the greater Toronto, Ontario, Canada area. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 6:00 am by Sherron Watkins
These brave people stood in the gap, saying and doing something so that ‘evil would not triumph. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:00 am by John Jenkins
  Traditionally, we’re accustomed to thinking of materiality by reference to the TSC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am by Eric Goldman
Hawks Dismissed * Michael Savage Takedown Letter Might Violate 512(f)–Brave New Media v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Dissent: The $500 limit is not too low, and the $3k limit is no different from the prohibition on foreign contributions upheld in Bluman v. [read post]